|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Vision Tracking: Did the GDC get it right this year or not? | |||
| Yes, they got it! This is the year. |
|
27 | 55.10% |
| No, Another disappointment. Maybe next year... |
|
22 | 44.90% |
| Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Honestly, I don't see much of an advantage of it for auton. Unless you can get a ball, line up the target, and shoot it 100% of the time.
It's going to be essential for teleop though. There is no way a driver can manually make a shot without a camera feed on their netbook/drivers station. That's where vision will be awesome! |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
While there is a use in autonomous, it seems as if you can place the balls where you'd want, thus allowing the use of encoders and some dead reckoning to allow a shot on target (You know your position, you know the ball's position, and you know the goal's position. It's all a matter of math and distances/timing from there). With regards to teleop....yes having a live video feed is useful, but that's not necessarily vision-tracking, rather just a camera feed. And as your goal is on your side of the field, homing in on the target is not that big of a deal in my opinion. It might be useful if you're looking to score in your opponents goal rather...
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
The reason auton scoring is beneficial, in my opinion, is that the goals will be completely undefended. You might not even need to camera track to score in them.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Can't say if they got it right, but can say we want to use it this year, IF we can get it to work.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Is there going to be some kind of prepared program we can download?
If so can someone please post a link. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Radical Pi : 09-01-2010 at 21:21. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Found the code for targeting. According to the comments lighting should have no effect on it. For you tech savvy people (isn't that everyone here?), download the windriver updater, rename it to a .zip, and unzip it. In the folder go to vxworks-6.3\target\src\demo\2010ImageDemo. Target.cpp is the source code for the targeting system.
Looks like they just went with converting the color image into monochromatic and looking for the changes there. they even made detecting the circle an API call. oh and indubitably you can find the LabVIEW update here. Last edited by Radical Pi : 09-01-2010 at 21:35. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
thank you
Last edited by indubitably : 09-01-2010 at 21:39. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Anyway I can find the Java camera code? I saw it once somewhere, but can't remember. Thanks in advance!
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
I'm really excited for this year. Live video streams to the drivers will be amazing, and the targeting is built into the API (through their ellipse-finding code). Now teams will have consistant, (hopefully) reliable, and contained targeting code that's standard across the board.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
It uses RobertDrive class which does not support crab drive
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Since it is not possible to support all type of robot bases with the current WPILib, it controls what is probably the most common. At one level it computes an angle to rotate, then uses robot drive to rotate. It should be pretty easy to map to alternate drive bases. Of course you will likely want it to move forward, kick, line up with another, etc.
Greg McKaskle |
|
#15
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Vision tracking: Did they get it right?
Is vision needed in this game?
Is the goal stationary? YES Do you know the location of the balls prior to Auton? YES Do you know your robot location prior to Auton? YES Is there potential defense in auton? NO Can a human score without camera? YES Is vision needed in this game? NO We are all for using the camera, when the effort is worth it. We used it in 06, because it was worth it. We will not use it this year because it is not worth it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is fedex right? did ship get delayed for central Mass? | Joe G. | General Forum | 7 | 21-02-2009 19:38 |
| So what did we get right? | geeknerd99 | Chit-Chat | 9 | 10-05-2006 13:11 |
| 71's Vision Tracking Problems | Bill Beatty | Rumor Mill | 7 | 19-04-2005 17:41 |
| did they | Jgreenwd1 | Championship Event | 1 | 29-04-2002 11:45 |
| They got it right in LA (Times)! | dlavery | Regional Competitions | 0 | 10-04-2002 15:26 |