Go to Post I would be happy playing matches in a waffle house parking lot - mesamb1 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 18:58
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,789
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rule question (G29 and G27)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike dennis View Post
I would think that penalties count because the second robot to enter the far zone is being pentalized. right?
But if it's E-stopped, it can't be penalized.

I would assume that if an E-stopped robot fell into it's opponent's zone while a partner was there, the partner would need to get its *wheels* out of there in a hurry to avoid getting penalized. I can "easily" block both goals with one working robot that can push and one E-stopped one, leaving the door open for blocking both goals and not getting any penalties, if <G29> isn't applied to the running robot.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 19:12
Jimmy K's Avatar
Jimmy K Jimmy K is offline
Registered User
FRC #1002 (Circuit Runners)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 52
Jimmy K is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Rule question (G29 and G27)

It depends on which of the two robots are penalized if there are two robots in the opponents zone. If only the first or only the second robot to enter the zone gets penalized, then the robot that would incur the penalty could be E-Stopped. But if both robots, or the alliance is given the penalty, then it doesn't matter which robot is E-Stopped.
__________________

  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 19:50
Matthew2c4u's Avatar
Matthew2c4u Matthew2c4u is offline
Registered User
AKA: Matt Baker
FRC #1622 (Spyder)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Poway, California
Posts: 58
Matthew2c4u has a spectacular aura aboutMatthew2c4u has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to Matthew2c4u Send a message via MSN to Matthew2c4u
Re: Rule question (G29 and G27)

This brings up the intresting point of what if there both estoped? blue team cant score and the bots cant take penaltys.
Remember though, preventing scoring doesnt help anyone in this game, seeding rating is all based on the winners score so winning a low scoring game doesnt help you.
I think also you would get a red card if you didnt pull the estop off fast enough.
Once again, possible finals strat, definatly not the way to play for seeding points in qualifying rounds.
__________________
This year is an "Outside" The box year.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 19:58
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,743
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rule question (G29 and G27)

<G27> excuses a robot from further penalties.

It appears <G29> is a single penalty. So once it's assessed, that's it. No more penalties, so there's no further penalties under <G27> to excuse. Except <G29> has more to it: "plus a RED CARD if effort to remedy is not immediate." If you E-stop, you have removed all possible remedies. Do you want to risk a red card for this strategy?
__________________
(since 2004)
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 11:55
shocker4256's Avatar
shocker4256 shocker4256 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Luke Pukatch
FRC #0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: South Windsor
Posts: 6
shocker4256 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Rule question (G29 and G27)

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
But if it's E-stopped, it can't be penalized.

I would assume that if an E-stopped robot fell into it's opponent's zone while a partner was there, the partner would need to get its *wheels* out of there in a hurry to avoid getting penalized. I can "easily" block both goals with one working robot that can push and one E-stopped one, leaving the door open for blocking both goals and not getting any penalties, if <G29> isn't applied to the running robot.
Exactly. You could easily take one robot go park it in front of a goal E-Stop. Drive another robot and block the other goal with a non e-stopped robot. Of course this would kill your Coopertition Bonus.
__________________


-.-. .- -. / -.-- --- ..- / -.. . -... ..- .-. / -- -.-- / .-. --- -... --- --. .. .-. .-.. ..-. .-. .. . -. -..
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 12:51
daltore's Avatar
daltore daltore is offline
Electronics/programming/design
AKA: Aaron Osmer
FRC #3529 (ausTIN CANs)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 272
daltore has a spectacular aura aboutdaltore has a spectacular aura aboutdaltore has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to daltore Send a message via MSN to daltore Send a message via Yahoo to daltore
Re: Rule question (G29 and G27)

I think this is one of those Gracious Professionalism strategies if you're talking about using it as a strategy. If you have a robot in the defense zone that gets knocked over, and there's no hope for recovery so it gets E-stopped, I would guess that any other robot on your alliance to enter that zone would get a penalty. Even if that is not true, it's just not cool to try to pull something like that on purpose. The E-stop is an EMERGENCY stop, and shouldn't be used as part of a strategy.

It is an interesting point though, I'll give you that...
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G27 ALIBI Rules/Strategy 12 08-01-2008 01:05
rule <g29> and flag gondorf Rules/Strategy 4 28-01-2007 22:43
Rule G29 stillwaters130 Rules/Strategy 3 08-01-2007 18:14
Rule G11 and Springs Rule mtaman02 Technical Discussion 3 23-01-2004 17:43


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi