|
#46
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Quote:
Then you get the rankings using: Seeding score Highest coopertition bonus Hanging points Electronic coin toss. |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
exactly so in the order that 9.3.7 states than a losing team can rank higher than a winning team
|
|
#48
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
but its not a tie though so its like, Red scores 10 but gets a 2 point penalty so they get 8 seeding points, Blue scores 2 points 0 penalty so they get 10 seeding points, so until their next match Blue is ranked ahead of Red
|
|
#50
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Quote:
Red gets 8+2*2=12, Blue gets 10. Until the next match, Red has 2 more seeding points and the Coopertition bonus tiebreaker over Blue. |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
the rules say it as Co-op only being used in the circumsyance of a tie
|
|
#52
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Read Section 9.3.5. Especially the words that I bolded when I quoted it a couple of posts ago. The Coop bonus is in seeding points. Can I make it any more clear?
|
|
#53
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Quote:
Quote:
The bonus is seeding points. In addition, the bonus is used for tiebreaking, but that is not the only use. |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
they said that the seeding points and the Co-op points will be kept separately unless needed to undo a tie
|
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Disregard that post. I goofed up. Sorry.
|
|
#56
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Quote:
And you're reversed on the Co-op bonus makeup. It's not that the bonus is based on your seeding points, it's that the bonus is extra seeding points. |
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Ok im not trying to sound defiant or saying that you guys arent wrong and I am right, I am just trying to figure it out but it never says that Co-op are seeding points
Last edited by dodar : 09-01-2010 at 20:14. |
|
#58
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
No, they are adding to your seeding point total. The bonus is not using seeding points, it is using unpenalized scores. Seeding points are penalized scores.
|
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
Ok my bad guys, my Dad just came in here and described how the rules are saying that rule and I now understand it, sorry for the confusion
|
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Breakaway Discussion
"9.3.4 Match Seeding Points
All teams on the winning ALLIANCE will receive a number of seeding points equal to the penalized score (the score with any assessed penalties) of the winning ALLIANCE. All teams on the losing ALLIANCE will receive a number of seeding points equal to un-penalized score (the score without any assessed penalties) of the winning ALLIANCE. 9.3.5 Coopertition™ Bonus All teams on the winning ALLIANCE will receive a coopertition bonus: a number of seeding points equal to twice the un-penalized score (the score without any assessed penalties) of the losing ALLIANCE." If I am reading this correctly this means that the formula for the winning team A is S=P+2L Where S is the seeding score; P is the penalized score of the winning team, and L is the un-penalized score of the losing team. So say the Red Alliance wins over the Blue Alliance 15-0 but incurred 3 penalties. The Red seeding score would be 15 and the Blue seeding score would be 18. Is this correct? Am I missing something? If not I believe this to be the only downfall of this game. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Breakaway Logo | WilliPri | General Forum | 2 | 09-01-2010 13:00 |
| Breakaway Manual Test | markulrich | Rules/Strategy | 0 | 09-01-2010 12:22 |
| New (breakaway) team, very nervous... | synth3tk | General Forum | 9 | 22-02-2008 23:42 |
| Extra Discussion for Picture Discussion | Ianworld | Robot Showcase | 1 | 31-01-2005 01:28 |
| Repeated discussion | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:56 |