|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Dimension Clarification
This doesn't seem to be allowed even if the bumpers go completely around the edge of the concave portion. The wording is subtle but it doesn't seem like any concave configurations will be allowed at all by way of:
<R07>A: Bumpers must cover the entire FRAME PERIMETER FRAME PERIMETER is determined using the string-wrap method (thus spanning the gap) <R07>M: Bumpers can't span gaps where there is no physical frame on which to attach |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Dimension Clarification
Quote:
Quote:
This is my opinion, which is worthless for any FRC competition. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Dimension Clarification
Quote:
But yes, no gaps at bumper height is my interpretation too. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot Dimension Clarification
now can you use guiding bars to guide the ball to the middle of the bot beneath the bumpers, of course using only 3 inches of the ball.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Dimension Clarification
If the ball gets more than 3 inches under the frame, then no. Otherwise, I don't see a problem with it.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dimension of Bump | 5n1p3r | Rules/Strategy | 7 | 15-01-2010 00:51 |
| Trailer dimension contradictions? | Stephanie.S | Technical Discussion | 0 | 14-01-2009 15:21 |
| Question on the Dimension of the Robot | ScottX | General Forum | 4 | 03-01-2009 23:42 |
| <G18> - Maximum dimension | StevenB | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 09-01-2008 20:48 |
| Minor Goal Dimension | Todd Lawless | OCCRA | 1 | 21-10-2002 22:28 |