|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: "Heading" balls?
I cannot find a definition of "active". If it is simply any moving piece, then we should be able to have a stationary ramp or something on the robot which the ball can roll down so long as the track is stationary. If "active" means any part put there solely for the purpose of directing a ball somewhere, then this strategy is not legal. Thoughts?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Championship Event - Where the "Random" Match Sorting Really "Shines" | Travis Hoffman | Championship Event | 57 | 19-04-2007 08:06 |
| New NEMO White Papers! "Creating a Killer Packet" and "25 Ways to Sponsor" | Jessica Boucher | Team Organization | 0 | 10-08-2005 10:55 |
| "Thunderbirds" Vs. "Team America" Which one will rule the box office? | Elgin Clock | Chit-Chat | 3 | 07-09-2004 19:53 |
| Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? | gnormhurst | Programming | 3 | 22-02-2004 02:55 |
| how tall is the ramp when in "up" and "balanced" position??? | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 00:54 |