Go to Post Team 233 cannot wait for the Florida Regional, but they have to because they have to build a robot or something first. . . - IbleedPink233 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 22:57
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,625
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblake View Post
Folks,

Please don't be shy about posting your ideas in this thread - As we update the 5th Gear match simulator (2009 5th Gear thread) for this season we are having to guess at the answers to this exact topic, so that we can give the simulated robots the right capabilities.

Keep tossing out ideas about different robot styles, robot functions or game play strategies so that we can soak them up and give you a better simulator.

Blake
gblake, would it be alright if I PMed you ideas I may not want to put in the thread at this time, but I'm guessing will be competitive?

To contribute, I believe this game will of course be ruled by a team that multi tasks well. However, doing a single task extremely well is often better than doing a multi task in mediocre fashion. I believe there will be robots that primarily shoot, interact with the bar with or without teammates, or push balls. The latter will be useful strategically in the center of the field for ball control, as it's very beneficial to have balls on one end of the field. I can see an alliance of a super shooter, a bar interaction robot with limited shooting, and a robot specializing in ball control winning events.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)

Last edited by Chris is me : 09-01-2010 at 23:01.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 23:06
Mr. Pockets's Avatar
Mr. Pockets Mr. Pockets is offline
Optimist Alumnus
AKA: Nathan
FRC #1189 (Gearheads)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 551
Mr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Pockets has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Classifications

A few that I was toying with.

Offense - Pretty self explanatory (no sub-group ideas yet)

Defense (see below for sub-groups I came up with)
-Guards: bots who do the best they can to limit movement between sections
-Goalies: Guard goals

Utility
-Hangers: Bots who are both very good climbers, but also easy to climb on.
-Conveyors: middle area bots used to syphon game pieces along.
__________________
Year 1: Learned about Projects
Year 2: Learned about People
Year 3: Learned about Pride
Year 4: Learned about Promise


I came to robotics for the robot, but stayed for the people

2012/13 Melancholic retiree and wistful dreamer
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 23:30
EversmannJ's Avatar
EversmannJ EversmannJ is offline
Registered User
FRC #2583
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 4
EversmannJ is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pockets View Post
-Conveyors: middle area bots used to syphon game pieces along.
I think these will become important. Ball control is always extremely useful in a game like this, if a Midfielder can't hit the goal consistently than their main objective should become "move as many balls to the opponent's side of the field as possible." A very simple way to do this would be herding (possibly kicking without an upwards angle) through the tunnels. A constant flow of balls into the center of the field would make the Forward's job much simpler.
__________________
EXPERIENCE:
It's what you get when you don't get what you wanted.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 23:09
gblake's Avatar
gblake gblake is online now
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,934
gblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
gblake, would it be alright if I PMed you ideas I may not want to put in the thread at this time, but I'm guessing will be competitive?
It's more than alright - Please do

FYI - Robot capabilities that you/anyone might describe are what might make their way into the simulation (if they aren't too complex for our current physics, etc. or for operating using a single XBox controller - We do have limitations ); but specific strategies that take advantage of combinations those capabilities won't be part of the game - Strategy comes from those 5.4 million hours of brainpower Dave Lavery talked about. 5th Gear users have to develop/explore their own strategies.

Also, like last year, 5th Gear won't be released until the 2nd half of the build season.

Finally, remember the long-view Dave, Woody and Dean emphasized. We win individually when we all succeed 5-10 years from now. Donating a good idea to the community just might be more rewarding than playing your cards close to your vest. I know I could be convinced to give out a few rep points to posters who do that.

So - Yes please post or PM your ideas and be part of this year's successes.

Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 23:19
Passion Passion is offline
Jim Zhou
FRC #2198
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 29
Passion has a spectacular aura aboutPassion has a spectacular aura aboutPassion has a spectacular aura about
Re: Robot Classifications

There are different ways of "kicking". Of course, when they say kick, people right away think of how a human would kick, which was demonstrated on Today's presentation.
Our ideas of output system, would be securing the soccer ball against a piston, and then when time is right, the piston pushes the ball straight into the goal post. We just thought of this idea today, it is definitely much more sophisticated than this.

We had slightly considered of going defense, but what if our robot is the only defensive robot on the team?
I am sure it would be very hard for the our robot to defend two goal posts to prevent 3 robots scoring...
Speaking of that, I don't recall reading anything about this in the rules; is it legal to have all 3 robots that are on the same team to be on the same segment of the field?
By segment, I meant such as end zone, or mid-field, or scoring-zone

Last edited by Passion : 09-01-2010 at 23:23.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 23:30
Aaron Lussier's Avatar
Aaron Lussier Aaron Lussier is offline
Volunteer for hire
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 881
Aaron Lussier is a splendid one to beholdAaron Lussier is a splendid one to beholdAaron Lussier is a splendid one to beholdAaron Lussier is a splendid one to beholdAaron Lussier is a splendid one to beholdAaron Lussier is a splendid one to beholdAaron Lussier is a splendid one to behold
Re: Robot Classifications

Just had a wacky idea.

A fast goalie bot, that has different hanging attachments to suit partners. Also, be strong enough to support the 400 some odd pounds.
__________________
Team 151 Student/Mentor 2001-2004
US Navy 2005 -2009
Volunteer 2010 - ???
Field Reset Extraordinaire
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 00:21
ssa3512 ssa3512 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steve
FRC #2537 (RAID)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 11
ssa3512 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Lussier View Post
Also, be strong enough to support the 400 some odd pounds.
Given the maximum weight of ANY fieldable robot is 120 pounds, I would think you would only need to support a total of 360 pounds from your lifting device, and 240 from any part of the robot that another robot would attach to (assuming that the third robot attaches to the second one)
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 00:24
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,731
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssa3512 View Post
Given the maximum weight of ANY fieldable robot is 120 pounds, I would think you would only need to support a total of 360 pounds from your lifting device, and 240 from any part of the robot that another robot would attach to (assuming that the third robot attaches to the second one)
120 lbs, yes--without the battery or bumpers, which are up to 15 lbs apiece.

150 is a far better estimate per robot, so 450 is a really good set of working numbers for supporting 3 robots.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 00:27
ssa3512 ssa3512 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steve
FRC #2537 (RAID)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 11
ssa3512 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Robot Classifications

Ah right, I forgot the bumpers and battery are not counted in the weight. I think I need to go read the rules again about 10 more times before everything sinks in.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2010, 01:21
Pluribus Pluribus is offline
Registered User
FRC #0948
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bellevue
Posts: 1
Pluribus is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Robot Classifications

Don't forget to keep in mind the "Coopertion" bonus. Because of this seeding scoring system, it can actually be useful, in seeding matches, to have your opponent score highly. For this reason, a bot that is really good at defense can actually be a detriment to the team.
The Coopertion bonus is that if you win, your seeding score is your score, plus two times your opponents score. The losing team gets what their opponent got. In a tie, both teams get 3 times the score.
9.3.5 for the specific rules regarding this... interesting seeding system.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 00:26
vhcook's Avatar
vhcook vhcook is online now
Reader of Things
AKA: Victoria
FRC #1939 (Kuh-nig-its)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 546
vhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssa3512 View Post
Given the maximum weight of ANY fieldable robot is 120 pounds, I would think you would only need to support a total of 360 pounds from your lifting device, and 240 from any part of the robot that another robot would attach to (assuming that the third robot attaches to the second one)
Per <R10-A>The weight of the battery (~15 lbs) and bumpers (max 20 lbs <R07-G>) are not counted in the 120. Max weight is thus 155 per robot.
__________________


  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 00:33
Captain Fink Captain Fink is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joseph Finkiewicz
FRC #1584 (Pirates)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Nederland, Colorado
Posts: 16
Captain Fink is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Robot Classifications

well the 120 pound weight limit doesnt include the battery or the bumpers
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 00:47
jarcrazy jarcrazy is offline
BradC
FRC #2062 (C.O.R.E.)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Waukesha
Posts: 5
jarcrazy is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Robot Classifications

Ok being able to hold 360lbs is good and al but last year the weight of the total robot did not include the battaries and controls right. So its more like 380lbs not to mention that holding all of that weight would be an amzing feat in its own if I see three hanging robots that would be assume. You can probably tell that I don't care for the final part in this game however fun it may look I'm an offenseive person by nature.
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 00:34
DanDon's Avatar
DanDon DanDon is offline
ohhh MY god
AKA: Dan Hoizner
FRC #0375 (The Robotic Plague)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 1,432
DanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond reputeDanDon has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to DanDon Send a message via AIM to DanDon Send a message via MSN to DanDon
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by Passion View Post
Speaking of that, I don't recall reading anything about this in the rules; is it legal to have all 3 robots that are on the same team to be on the same segment of the field?
By segment, I meant such as end zone, or mid-field, or scoring-zone
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2009 FRC Game Manual - Section 7 - The Game
<G29> Defending ROBOT Restriction - Only one opposing ALLIANCE ROBOT is allowed in the
opponent’s ZONE. A ROBOT is considered in this ZONE if any part of the ROBOT is in
contact with the ZONE's green carpet. Violation: PENALTY; plus a RED CARD if effort to
remedy is not immediate.
As long as you're not talking about the opponent's scoring zone, then there are no restrictions.
__________________
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 23:13
hg273's Avatar
hg273 hg273 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Henry Gordon
FRC #1540 (Flaming Chickens)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 88
hg273 will become famous soon enough
Re: Robot Classifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by Passion View Post
We had slightly considered of going defense, but what if our robot is the only defensive robot on the team?
I am sure it would be very hard for the our robot to defend two goal posts to prevent 3 robots scoring...
Speaking of that, I don't recall reading anything about this in the rules; is it legal to have all 3 robots that are on the same team to be on the same segment of the field?
Remember that you can only have one robot defending the opposing zone, unless you want to incur a red card. If you want to be a solely defensive bot, you should focus on being able to defend against 2 robots. I say two, because, although it is legal to have all three robots in an offensive zone, I don't think any alliance would leave two opposing robots unguarded.
__________________
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Robot-to-robot and robot-to-trailer GaryVoshol Rules/Strategy 11 06-01-2009 19:18
pic: 233 robot teaser, yep, theres our robot ; ) ducttapedude Extra Discussion 20 15-02-2007 22:02
pic: Team 114 Real Robot Vs. Inventor Robot James114 Robot Showcase 3 18-02-2005 13:02
Can an a robot take a tetra from another robot in their allinace? Koko Ed Rules/Strategy 3 10-01-2005 23:01
Robot Gallery from the 2003 robot expostion in Tokyo, Japan Andrew Rudolph Chit-Chat 1 04-12-2003 15:22


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:17.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi