|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules about goalie
There is indeed a rule against this. I don't have the time to find exactly where it is, but it is ILLEGAL to have two of an alliance's robots in the opposing alliance's zone. This essentially curtails any strategy of goal-keeping.
The other thing that ought to keep you from doing this is the Co-Opertition Bonus. The winning alliance receives 2x the unpenalized score of the losing alliance, counted separately. (So if you win a match by 12-1, you really are just hurting yourself). I'm not sure if this is vice-versa (losing alliance gets 2x the winning alliance), but I've seen that mentioned here. Rule of thumb in the future: READ THE MANUAL! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rules about goalie
this stratagy is what we our looking at for our robot, but with just our bot swapping between the two goals
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rules about goalie
Would be pointless to be swapping though.. unless your robot moves fast enough. Then again you could just play the zone defense: (where g are the goals)
x x x g g But then you severely limit your own point gains from goals. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rules about goalie
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rules about goalie
well you have time from when the ball is "kicked" to when it lands in the goal plenty enough time for almost any robot to stop it unless the ball is lauched like a cannon. unless they are in the nearest area then i havent came up with a stratagy against that
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Questions about rules? | Karl200 | General Forum | 1 | 05-01-2009 13:52 |
| Rules about pressure gauge position | Kamen64 | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 06-02-2007 19:15 |
| About the new rules-about the updated Rule <G09> | aten | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 13-01-2007 13:20 |
| Questions about rules | ahecht | Rules/Strategy | 9 | 07-01-2002 22:45 |
| What about the new rules | CMC | Rumor Mill | 16 | 27-10-2001 06:34 |