Go to Post Safe zones are for the weak. - ChristopherSD [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 16:22
Heath's Avatar
Heath Heath is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kevin Heath
FRC #2840 (PCDS Robotics)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4
Heath is an unknown quantity at this point
Articulation

Are robots with articulated frames allowed under the rules? Any thoughts and suggestions?
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2010, 16:25
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,825
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Articulation

Nope.

Quote:
<R11> The FRAME PERIMETER must be comprised of fixed, non-articulated structural elements of the ROBOT. The FRAME PERIMETER must remain a fixed, unchanging polygon throughout the MATCH.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2010, 00:03
mbushroe mbushroe is offline
Registered User
FRC #2840
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 16
mbushroe is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Articulation

I would like a more official declaration on this subject, too. An articulated vehicle, just like the big earth movers, would make lots of sense. If you make two rigid frames, shaped like the home plate in baseball, with bumpers covering all 5 sides of each half, it would seem to still meet the rules. At the pivot point, the rules allow for a short section of compressible bumper that the pivot mechanism would squish on one side.

This type of vehicle construction would greatly improve the steering and traction at the same time. It would, however, greatly limit the room for a ball handling/kicking mechanism.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2010, 00:14
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,825
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Articulation

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbsuroe View Post
I would like a more official declaration on this subject, too. An articulated vehicle, just like the big earth movers, would make lots of sense. If you make two rigid frames, shaped like the home plate in baseball, with bumpers covering all 5 sides of each half, it would seem to still meet the rules. At the pivot point, the rules allow for a short section of compressible bumper that the pivot mechanism would squish on one side.

This type of vehicle construction would greatly improve the steering and traction at the same time. It would, however, greatly limit the room for a ball handling/kicking mechanism.
That type of construction would make compliance with <R07> impossible.

Let's say that you built that frame type rigidly. You would not be able to put bumpers on that met <R07-I> or <R07-A>, attaching to the frame perimeter, under the definition of a frame perimeter, without violating <R07-M>. Now, you make it articulate, as described. Not only are you violating the aforementioned <R07-A> and <R07-I>, you are violating <R11> and, at the same time, <R07-M>.

However, there is a way to do this legally. Build a solid exterior frame in the bumper zone that covers the largest perimeter allowed, and have the articulating drive underneath or inside. (Or just use a crab drive.)

I can understand wanting a more official declaration. I'm just saying that you should prepare for that articulation type, without the above suggestion incorporated, to be officially declared illegal.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi