|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lifting mecanisms
My team is looking at a winch with some sort of telescoping mecanism to get a hook up to the top of the platform.
does this sound logical? and do any other teams have ideas for lifting their bots up on the tower? |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Sounds reasonable.
I'd like to encourage teams this year to go back and look at the last two times there's been hanging: 2004 and 2000. And, a tip from someone who built a robot to play the 2004 game, make sure that you can get your hook out of places you don't want it and then still hang, if you can. (Examples: the floor, another robot's lightening holes (actually happened once in 2004), the bar itself, the ball return, a tower pole...) |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Quote:
Personally, I have none at the moment. I have gone from pneumatics, to scissor lifts. I'm still considering the best way. -Rion |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Quote:
I've seen some other fast ways too. (P.S. We have another CIM motor available this year, for a total of 5 maximum.) |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Quote:
(I seemed to have over looked the extra CIM... )-Rion PS. Is that a typo or did I over look the weight change limit? |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Quote:
And the extra CIM happens to be located in <R52-D>. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
150lb would be the number to use this year with full weight bot + 20lb bumper allowance + ~10 lb battery
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Quote:
Ah see, there is my problem. I am on <R08> at the moment. I am not an extremely fast reader... -Rion |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Quote:
It is definitely possible to lift a 150 lb robot with motor(s), just remember to think about back driving when the power turns off at the end of the match. ![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
well my dad mentioned the winch on the front of a 4 wheeler to be possible, we would have to adapt it to a cim motor but it should be able to lift like 500 lbs
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
One could easily overcome this with a simple pneumatic locking mechanism, or even a passive tension powered lock.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
You could also use a worm gear.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Quote:
And to echo what Eric said, make sure youe hooks are secure on your robot. A lot of teams lost their hooks before they made it to the bar from collisions. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
To bring a little more "training" to the discussion... you just have to look at the maximum power of your motors to determine the absolute fastest you can get a robot up.
Power = Work / Time Work = Force * Distance so Power = Force * Distance / Time or Power = Force * Speeeeeeeed The CIM motors max out at 343W = 252 lbf*ft/s So the fastest an optimally geared CIM will lift a bot is about 1.5 ft/s. Or you lift in about a second. Mind, this assume you're instantly at the max power point, no friction losses, spherical chickens, the works. But, lifting your robot 20" in, say, 5 seconds is easily doable if you gear it right. The gearing it right being key. Max power occurs at 1/2 stall torque. But I'd really aim for 1/4 - 1/3 stall torque for your full load, for safety and losses and all that. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lifting mecanisms
Remember that the more you gear down the more time it will take to lift...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Heavy Lifting | Spen.M.P. | Chit-Chat | 9 | 23-01-2009 06:29 |
| Lifting one vs. lifting two | jgannon | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 14-01-2007 17:37 |
| Lifting robots | rjbarra | Technical Discussion | 8 | 09-01-2007 01:23 |
| robot lifting | doomsdaytank | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 14-01-2003 16:41 |
| Lifting goals | patrickrd | Rules/Strategy | 6 | 17-01-2002 17:58 |