Go to Post I tried to make them look at disgruntled as possible. - Katie_UPS [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2010, 22:23
Trent B Trent B is offline
College Mentor
AKA: Trent Borman
no team (Surviving Grad School)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 479
Trent B is a splendid one to beholdTrent B is a splendid one to beholdTrent B is a splendid one to beholdTrent B is a splendid one to beholdTrent B is a splendid one to beholdTrent B is a splendid one to beholdTrent B is a splendid one to beholdTrent B is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Trent B Send a message via Yahoo to Trent B
Torque, gearboxs and chain gearing

Hypothetical situation I can't seem to wrap my head around. (Not sure if this fits motors but I suppose it does given the relationship of gearings to motors)

Lets say I take a CIM motor and calibrate it to run at <40amps constantly (so it wont trip the 40amp fuse) and it is putting out some amount of ft-lbs of torque.

Banebots P80 gearboxes say to not use over 85ft-lbs of torque. So lets say that I find a gear ratio that perfectly puts of 85ft-lbs of torque.

Now lets say I run a 12 tooth on the p80 and a 24 tooth on the receiving end effectively doubling the torque to 170ft-lbs, would this mean the P80 now has an effective load of 85 ft-lbs on its output shaft or is it putting out 85ft-lbs of torque under the limit, and the gearing is causing 170ft-lbs on the receiving end.

I think the wording on banebots site sort of confused me into this scenario since when I think about that 150k:1 VEX Gearbox the beginning is effortless to turn and adding more and more reductions doesn't change torque required (correct?) thus the CIM should still operate at the same original level of torque and the gearbox at its 85ft-lbs or is there something I am missing.

Edit, now I think it may make sense to me, one point of a reduction gearbox is to get more torque without more work on the other end so I assume as long as the max torque of our CIM motor (controlled by current and CAN bus) stays below 85ft-lbs there would be no risk in gearing it up?

Trent
__________________
Former 2502 (Talon) Captain and 3928 (Neutrino) Mentor, currently teamless and attending Penn State for graduate school.
Have questions about Iowa State University or Penn State University? Feel free to email or PM me

Last edited by Trent B : 11-01-2010 at 22:26.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DC Motor and Gearing Red-Rx7 Motors 18 22-03-2008 16:35
pic: Wheels and gearing Wayne C. Robot Showcase 20 06-02-2005 17:54
link: 1014 guts and gearing Skillz Robot Showcase 2 24-02-2004 13:24
Chiaphua gearing (Chippy and Bosch) honky Motors 3 31-01-2002 10:28
Chain and chain breaker source? kmcclary Off-Season Events 4 22-10-2001 22:51


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:12.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi