|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Team Update #2! 1/15/2010
Very challenging to cut down on bouncing though to use such a funnel.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Team Update #2! 1/15/2010
[MECHANISMS are considered “active” if they are in motion relative to the ROBOT while in contact with the BALL. Resetting or moving MECHANISMS while not in contact with a BALL is permitted as the MECHANISMS are not considered “active.”]
What about a robot part that moves due to forces such as the impact of the ball, or inertia related to robot accelerations? For example, a loose cargo net, which would move if the robot stopped or turned suddenly and of course when hit by a ball. How about a padded surface that gets depressed by a ball hitting it? Both of these are 'moving' relative to the robot while in contact with the ball. It seems the 'spirit' of the "active" definition seems to apply to mechanisms which move due to robot actuators. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Team Update #2! 1/15/2010
Im curious about the 13.5" change in the BUMP height. I was in NH for the kickoff and noticed the angle seemed steeper than 45 degrees. What does this height change do for the BUMP?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Team Update #2! 1/15/2010
Quote:
I think the angle is still 45 degrees. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Team Update #2! 1/15/2010
Thanks!
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official Team Update #2! 1/15/2010
I think the final thing that needs to be clarified to distinguish between Evan's interpretation and the interpretation adopted by Travis and I is what it means to be inside a feature.
I don't think that a ball can be inside a ramp. As a contrast I believe that a ball can be inside a playground slide shaped funneling feature. In my opinion such a feature complies with the rules if it is 3" deep or less. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Team Update #2! 1/15/2010
No matter what the meaning of the rule it will be up to the inspectors to intrepid them. One set of inspectors may go a little one way and another set of inspectors could go the other way. How will they get a consistent interpretation at the competition? How far can we go with the design and be safe from major reconstruction?
Last edited by joeweber : 17-01-2010 at 13:06. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [OCCRA]: Official Update #1 | Mike Martus | OCCRA | 0 | 12-09-2007 19:12 |
| Official Unofficial Robotics Film Contest Update. | BuddyB309 | General Forum | 0 | 11-02-2006 20:33 |
| Official FIRST Team Update | Jake Lewis | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 13-01-2004 20:03 |
| Official update #1 - 9/13 - Mike Martus | Mike Martus | OCCRA | 0 | 13-09-2003 21:48 |
| Official - Materials update. | Mike Martus | OCCRA | 0 | 26-09-2001 05:15 |