|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Frame
Quote:
As for a 4wd robot needing suspension....as far as I can tell, a simple 4wd skid steer robot is the best design for NOT needing suspension! it keeps at least 3 of it's four wheels on the in contact with the carpet when going over the bump, unlike 6wd and 8wd designs which have at least two wheels off in the air. Also you might have the possibility of the bumpers dipping below the BUMPER ZONE during rough pushing play, which might not be wise. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Frame
i have a thought out ideal, have the axle on a milled out plate, and have it be able to go up and down then have compression springs attached to it, i have a detailed drawing of the dim, i wish i could post it but dont know how
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Frame
Also think about how many times you'll actually want to cross the bumps, and how likely it is that your driver could slow down or stop before driving over the bump. I think you probably do not want to drive any robot over it very fast.
I personally see no need for suspension, it's just one more thing that takes a lot of time to design and perfect, and that adds weight and can break. There are plenty of other challenges this year....then hanging one is worthy of a lot of effort. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Frame
my thought is if u can reduce the chance of tipping it worth the time to look into it, hitting it at any angle greatly increase the the bot to flip
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Frame
Just be careful when using a suspension on wheels that are powered by chain - if there is too much play in the suspension and the chain is stationary on the other end, you can end up messing up your tension when you hit a bump (in the worst case, you could even throw a chain).
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Frame
true but i have that all figured out
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frame
Quote:
depending on how it works and when, you could actually increase your chance of tipping by causing a sudden shift in the robots center of gravity. of course, this is something you could flush out through testing. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frame
You would probably be best served by applying all the technical know-how you've got to keeping the Center of Gravity (CoG) as low and centrally located as possible. The benefits of this will probably far exceed those of a fancy suspension, especially one that you aren't actually constructing right now.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Frame
Quote:
The lesson here is that I should not base my entire opinion on a single data point. ![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Frame
How about pneumatic tires (aside from perhaps having too much traction)?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 48 Frame | Travis Hoffman | Extra Discussion | 6 | 26-01-2008 23:14 |
| pic: Frame is | falconmaster | Extra Discussion | 1 | 17-01-2008 23:11 |
| Steel Frame? | gburlison | Technical Discussion | 20 | 18-12-2007 16:56 |
| Frame Dragging | Wetzel | Math and Science | 0 | 22-10-2004 17:10 |
| Voltage on Frame | Greg | Electrical | 31 | 02-03-2004 13:49 |