|
|
|
 But really, FIRST attracts all kinds of people; nerds, geeks, dorks, preps, techies, PR people, financial persons, etc. - Dorienne [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| But really, FIRST attracts all kinds of people; nerds, geeks, dorks, preps, techies, PR people, financial persons, etc. - Dorienne [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
20-01-2010, 12:23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are we reading this accurately?
Does anyone else feel this whole seeding points/coopertition bonus thing would have been a whole lot easier to understand if they hadn't tried to give a special name for the bonus? A simple "Winner gets their own score plus 2X the loser's score" and "Loser gets the Winner's score" would have caused far less confusion. (Yes, I know penalties complicate it some, but you get the idea) Coming up with special names for things always leads to trouble - remember all the "Where do I buy REGOLITH?" threads last year?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Am I reading this right? | Bruceb | Motors | 1 | 18-01-2010 10:20 |
| Controlling Motors More Accurately | Glueeater | Programming | 8 | 26-03-2008 22:51 |
| Okay...Someone @ Nats has to be reading this...I hope.. | Justin | Championship Event | 2 | 11-04-2003 20:06 |
| CALLING ANYONE READING THIS!!! | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:42 |
| CALLING ANYONE READING THIS!!! | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:42 |
Threaded Mode