|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Robot configuration" Q&A response
http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=13940
Can somebody help me to understand this Q&A response? The question is certainly a little unclear, but the way I read it, I'd be inclined to believe it's legal. Since the GDC opted to be curt in their reply, and didn't explain what rule the asker's design would violate, I don't know how they read the question, and consequently I don't know what they're ruling as illegal. Any guesses? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [moderated]: In Response to "Taking FIRST and turning it into 'Israbluff'" | ctartist236 | General Forum | 15 | 05-02-2014 23:15 |
| Meaning of "Normal Configuration"? | RedHeadRobotics | General Forum | 5 | 23-01-2010 18:17 |
| G-FORCE's robot, named "philbot" a.k.a "armagedon in a polycarbonate box" | Bryan_2818 | Robot Showcase | 0 | 12-04-2009 20:54 |
| New Magazine "Robot" w/Vex, FIRST, & Lego everywhere | Astronouth7303 | FIRST In the News... | 2 | 28-12-2005 18:06 |
| Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? | gnormhurst | Programming | 3 | 22-02-2004 02:55 |