|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Robot Lifting
It is pretty obvious that people are spending a lot of time into the chassis, wheels, motors and even kickers. Well this thread is to bring attention to the lifting portion of the robot. I realize that a lot of people havent started that part yet, and i also realize that others have it made. Leave ideas, pictures, plans, problems, and everything you can think of about a device in order to lift the robot at the end of the competition. Thanks a lot.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
So far we have a Harbor Freight winch coupled to a AM 3 stage GEM transmission with a CIM that can seams like it is strong enough lift a small car
Eventually we will make a custom winch with the GEM but if we run out of time at least we have something. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
Quote:
I've got nothing else to show, other than that I've been inspired by the Pink team and the Poofs. I really have no idea how to do this. :3 |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
don't need the torque so much as you need to slow it down
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
We had the shooter concept in 2 days. The chassis in 4. Just today we had a major breakthrough on a simple way to hang and we're cadding it to check feasibility. We've spent time in every meeting so far discussing hanging.
I believe the difficulty hanging is disproportionate to the returns. Consider that if you didn't hang for those 20 seconds, you could probably get 1 more ball in the goal, rendering the hanging only really worth 1 point. Consider if non of your bots could hang, you could potential score 2 or 3 balls in that 20 seconds. Perhaps matches will be decided by a couple points, but this is NOTHING like 2007 where a single bot with a good ramp system could win 80% of it's seeding matches just by virtue of having those ramps. Finally, the difficultly of suspending means that I doubt very many matches will see robots suspended. Even if they do manage to suspend, that extra 1 point *probably* won't be all that important: I certainly would not make it a design priority. I look forward to someone building a bot specifically for the finale - there are ways to do it (twin ramps, lifting the other 2 robots on your team, etc). That bot could be a very valuable asset, but I don't think it's a game breaker like a good ramp bot was in '07. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
We are going for 3-5 seconds for BOTH cable attachment to tower bar using a latex tubing snap bar, and then fast elevation of our bot with pneumatic cable tensioning speed, having saved all of our air for the end game ( our kicker is a winder that stores bungee tension & releases at any point during the wind up for variable kick power). If you can't make this happen quickly there is little time left to help partners get off the floor. Yeah, the two points is marginal, but 5 or 8 starts looking worth it.
The initial pneumatic pull up will be supplemented by having more winder pulling available at a stronger than pneumatic force levels from our same kick winder mechanism. So, if partners can get hooked on to our deployed hanging Kevlar cables, even with a mere static hook at top of their frame, we can still hoist them up off ground using our kick winder drive pulling at 250+ pounds of lift. Heck, we will even loan them a hook to mount on their frame before the match begins! -RRLedford Last edited by RRLedford : 21-01-2010 at 00:50. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
5 seconds to attach and lift would make it worth doing. 20 seconds...not so much.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
Right now the plan is no winch, no cables... you will elevate us, and we will suspend you.
With a bit of credit to 1114's rack'n'roll design, we're looking at ramps. It's still in the design stage, however, and if it doesn't pan out, well... winches work, too. Jason |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
I couldn't agree more.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
Has anyone considered a compound pulley system to lift their robot?
This would be considerably easier to build than a large gearbox, could potentially be lighter, and would result in less mechanical strain on the gears and axels. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
It would be beneficial for teams to examine alternate lifting methods. Why is everyone so focused on hanging from the horizontal bar, when there are four vertical bars that would work just as well with a smaller, simpler mechanism?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
I don't see the smaller, simpler mechanism I could employ to hang from the horizontal bars. I've thought about it and anything that comes to mind isn't easy to detach. Vertical hooks just slide over the bar and pull up.
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
Quote:
Unless you could magically lift yourself up with a bag of air? -RC |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
Quote:
Edit: Bag of air?! Heck yes! |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Robot Lifting
Tension elements are the best approach for elevating, being lightest and strongest. Yes, you still need an arm to hook cable onto horizontal bar, but 1000 lb kevlar is light, and bar can be reached with the arc of a single arm rotation. Multiple long stroke air cylinders spreading pulleys apart in a compound array can give rapid cable tensioning lift to the required height, especially if you don't deplete your air reserves doing a pneumatic kicker.
-RRLedford Last edited by RRLedford : 21-01-2010 at 06:56. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1070's 2007 Robot Lifting | AznPrincess3089 | Robot Showcase | 8 | 19-03-2007 19:37 |
| Team 192, Robot Lifting Teaser | Joobacca | Robot Showcase | 7 | 02-02-2007 17:46 |
| Lifting one vs. lifting two | jgannon | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 14-01-2007 17:37 |
| robot lifting | doomsdaytank | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 14-01-2003 16:41 |
| Lifting goals | patrickrd | Rules/Strategy | 6 | 17-01-2002 17:58 |