Fasteners extending outside the FRAME PERIMETER

[IndySam]

The question is not outside the robot max size but outside the frame perimeter.

because of this being allowed again this year

<R07> D. Each BUMPER segment must be backed by a piece of ¾-inch thick by 5-inch tall piece of plywood. Each piece of BUMPER backing must be a minimum of 6 inches long. Small clearance pockets and/or access holes in the BUMPER backing are permitted, as long as they do not significantly affect the structural integrity of the BUMPER.


I would assume they will allow some protrusion again this year.

[Teched3]

If you have protrusion on the exterior of the frame, I believe that rules (IMO) intention is to allow you to provide clearance so the bumpers will fit solidly against the frame. Your robot must go into the sizing box and pass. Make your frame smaller to ensure it will pass with protrusions.

[engunneer]

Thanks for clarifying that. Your interpretation that the head of a bolt can be outside the frame perimeter appears to be correct, as long as there is a small clearance pocket in the bumper backing.

It may be worth it to Q&A this for heights not contained in the bumper zone.

[martin417]

Originally Posted by IndySam

The question is not outside the robot max size but outside the frame perimeter.

because of this being allowed again this year

<R07> D. Each BUMPER segment must be backed by a piece of ¾-inch thick by 5-inch tall piece of plywood. Each piece of BUMPER backing must be a minimum of 6 inches long. Small clearance pockets and/or access holes in the BUMPER backing are permitted, as long as they do not significantly affect the structural integrity of the BUMPER.


I would assume they will allow some protrusion again this year.

Since the frame of the bots this year will likely be quite tall (the bumper zone starts at 10" off the floor), the bumper zone is relatively small in proportion to the height of the bot. My concern is with fasteners in the current design that are below the bumper zone. No pockets in the bumper backing will be required to clear the bolt heads, but they are ~3/8" above the surface of the frame, therefore, by strict interpretation of <R16> would be in violation. I will need to see a ruling from the GDC.

[MrForbes]

My experience with the sizing box in 2008 makes me want to build the parts that are below and above the bumper zone to a size at least half an inch smaller than the bumper part of the frame.

Something about the sizing box not having a level base. We checked it. Not something you want to have to deal with.

[mikelowry]

I just asked the question on the Q&A.

[sanddrag]

It seems to me that if you have a fastener head sticking out of a frame member, then that fastener head now defines the frame perimeter. If you wrap a string around your robot and over the fastener heads, and it is more than the allowed dimensions, you are in violation. Why even take the chance? Build it smaller.

[martin417]

Originally Posted by sanddrag

It seems to me that if you have a fastener head sticking out of a frame member, then that fastener head now defines the frame perimeter. If you wrap a string around your robot and over the fastener heads, and it is more than the allowed dimensions, you are in violation. Why even take the chance? Build it smaller.

I don't understand the difficulty people are having with this question. I clearly stated that the question did not involve extending outside the allowed NORMAL CONFIGURATION (28" x 38"). And the definition of FRAME PERIMETER IS CLEAR:

"To determine the FRAME PERIMETER, wrap a piece of string around the ROBOT at the level of the BUMPER ZONE

(emphasis mine) I also stated that the protruding bolt heads are below the bumper zone (again, well within the 28" x 38" requirement) so no, the bolt heads do not define the FRAME PERIMETER. I have been through inspection, and understand clearly how size requirements are tested.

I do know that in the past this allowance has been made and wondered if it would be again.

[Al Skierkiewicz]

Martin,
The language is the same as in previous years. The frame perimeter includes the bolts and whatever else may be sticking out of the robot frame. It is this size that is determined to be within the robot sizing parameters when in the box. The rules for pockets in the bumpers is the same as well. It allows teams to make small holes in the back of the bumpers to accommodate secure mounting of the bumpers to the robot frame without the added clearance provided by fasteners.

The full definition is this..
FRAME PERIMETER – the polygon defined by the outer-most set of exterior vertices on the ROBOT (without the BUMPERS attached) that are within the BUMPER ZONE. To determine the FRAME PERIMETER, wrap a piece of string around the ROBOT at the level of the BUMPER ZONE - the string describes this polygon.
As further explained here...
<R16> During normal operation no part of the ROBOT shall extend outside the vertical projection of the FRAME PERIMETER, except as permitted by Rule <G30>.
Note: This means no “mushroom-bots.” If a ROBOT is designed as intended, in normal operation you should be able to push the ROBOT (with BUMPERS removed) up against a vertical wall, and the FRAME PERIMETER will be the only point of contact with the wall.

Therefore as I interpret the sum of rules, the bolt heads that are in the bumper zone define the frame perimeter and any other projections outside the bumper zone cannot extend beyond those set by the frame perimeter except as applied in <G30>.
Hope this helps.

[Vikesrock]

I was hoping the GDC would be rather speedy in responding to this question as it affects our frame design as well.

As it stands our upper frame is 26.5" wide. The lower frame is the same width, but the bolt heads for the wheel axles will protrude from the lower frame. In prior years this would not have been an issue as the bumpers were at the height of the lower frame and could have a clearance hole drilled in the back for each bolt head.

With the rules as they stand now, it seems like there may be a quick fix if the GDC comes back saying that fastener heads outside the Frame Perimeter at a non-bumper zone height are illegal. You could put identical fastener heads protruding from the frame members supporting the bumpers and drill clearance holes in the bumper for them. These fasteners would redefine the frame perimeter to a size large enough to cover the fastener heads on the lower frame.

[Al Skierkiewicz]

Kevin,
If it helps, bolt heads have always been tested with the box. If in the past you drilled out the back of the bumpers as allowed, the frame perimeter was still set by the maximum dimension of the bolts.

[Vikesrock]

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz

Kevin,
If it helps, bolt heads have always been tested with the box. If in the past you drilled out the back of the bumpers as allowed, the frame perimeter was still set by the maximum dimension of the bolts.

The obnoxious part is that the axle bolts for many teams this year are not in the BUMPER ZONE and thus do not set the FRAME PERIMETER. If an upper frame supporting the bumpers and a lower frame supporting the wheels are the same width and the upper frame has no protruding fasteners the axle bolt heads on the lower frame will be outside the FRAME PERIMETER and will violate <R16>.

I was suggesting that a simple workaround if these lower fasteners are not declared legal through the Q&A may be to have identical bolt heads in the level of the BUMPER ZONE so they redefine the FRAME PERIMETER as you mention in your post. This vertical projection of this larger FRAME PERIMETER would enclose the axle bolt heads preventing the <R16> violation.

I'm hoping the GDC makes all this moot with an answer to 1771's Q&A, as this workaround is more like a loophole

[artdutra04]

The least nitpicky and anal retentive solution to this would be for the GDC to allow static (non moving) fastener heads to stick out no more than 0.25" from the FRAME PERIMETER, as long as they still fit inside the sizing box. This meets the spirit of the rule of the FRAME PERIMETER (it's not like having a button head stick out an 1/8" from the FRAME PERIMETER, but still within the NORMAL CONFIGURATION, will give that team magical super powers or some unfair advantage) while allowing leeway for teams that can't/won't buy flat head bolts and a countersink tool.

The GDC has been getting better about these kind of situations lately, with relaxed tape rules, relaxed pneumatic rules, etc so I'm hopeful this will be the outcome here.

Originally Posted by Vikesrock

I was suggesting that a simple workaround if these lower fasteners are not declared legal through the Q&A may be to have identical bolt heads in the level of the BUMPER ZONE so they redefine the FRAME PERIMETER as you mention in your post. This vertical projection of this larger FRAME PERIMETER would enclose the axle bolt heads preventing the <R16> violation.

If GDC is fervent that the FRAME PERIMETER means the FRAME PERIMETER and that means absolutely no exceptions whatsoever, not even for fastener heads, then this is exactly what we are planning on doing: just installing dummy bolt heads to redefine the FRAME PERIMETER. Fine, we'll jump through your hoops and sit and play dead, but we won't enjoy one second of it.

[Rich Kressly]

As an aside, and as a general rule, we always design out robot to be at least 1 inch smaller than max footprint in all directions, allowing for any covers or fasteners, or stuff that may happen later.

The thing that would make this easiest this year would be to design the "lower" part of your frame to be a little smaller than the "mid" or "upper frame" that your bumpers attach to.

[DonRotolo]

Thank you Rich. Our design has the 'lower' frame (at wheel level) just a bit smaller than the 'upper' (bumper zone) frame, about 1/2" on all sides. The upper frame is just under 27" wide.

The simple solution is not adding dummy fasteners, but a 1/4 (or 3/8", whatever) strip along the outside of the frame perimeter. Nothing says it can't be birch plywood (lightweight) strips.

In theory, the lower frame could be as much as three inches smaller, eh?