|
|
|
 Good thing you skipped this year.
You don't need exhaustion to sleep through Recycle Rush. - Gregor [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Good thing you skipped this year.
You don't need exhaustion to sleep through Recycle Rush. - Gregor [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#6
25-01-2010, 12:07
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Some Camera Benchmarks
Just to give some comparison benchmarks, I did some testing In LabVIEW. With compression set to 5, here are the loop rates I got:
640x480 image: loop rate = 8 per second avg 320x240 image: loop rate = 10 per second avg 160x120 image: loop rate = 13 per second avg This might at least give you an idea of what you should be able to shoot for. A couple of other observations. With compression set to 0, loop rates suffered (expected). Increasing the compression above 5, didn't seem to improve loop rates, but it did affect the ability to find the target. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| <G14> - ya win some, ya lose some | GaryVoshol | Rules/Strategy | 62 | 24-03-2009 16:22 |
| Some Questions | ggberg | Rules/Strategy | 8 | 09-01-2008 16:51 |
| Tell the difference: 2007 CMU Camera, 2006, 2005 camera? | Chris_Elston | Programming | 2 | 07-01-2008 13:11 |
| Camera Help (New to Camera Programming) | Idaman323 | Programming | 6 | 14-01-2006 03:56 |
Threaded Mode