|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pre-charged Pneumatics
Tristan,
Concerning electromagnets, the GDC has been slow to make a definitive, clear ruling. As Al put it, what follows is my personal viewpoint... A very popular electric solenoid actuator is a hinged clapper design. This is a ferrous core electromagnet with a spring loaded ferrous plate hinged at one end. Applying power to the electromagnet causes the plate to clap to the magnet and deflects the spring. When the EM is de-energized, the spring moves the clapper away from the EM. Electric solenoid actuators are not allowed as per <R53>. Many of the designs I have read about sound like the team has made their own ESA and are calling it a magnetic lock. This would not be allowed under this year's rules. Concerning powered up robots. Al is 100% correct. The beginning of the inspection process is done with the battery removed... My last point is safety. The idea that unpowering a robot, intentionally or unintentionally that causes a mechanism to deploy is just not safe. Bottom line: While EMs are being allowed by the GDC, I can not envision an non-trivial, EM system that could be legally used on this year's robot. IMHO, the GDC has dug a hole and will have to enlighten us further... Regards, Mike |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I was charged to ship robot home from Atlanta | Sunshine | General Forum | 15 | 29-04-2008 16:14 |
| Beginning of Match - Charged tank | jdejoannis | Pneumatics | 6 | 30-01-2007 21:20 |
| Using pre-charged accumulators | Peter Matteson | Pneumatics | 8 | 14-02-2006 10:42 |
| 2006 Pre-Kickoff FF? | Billfred | Fantasy FIRST | 37 | 29-07-2005 11:11 |
| Charged 7.2 battery | Daniel Brim | Electrical | 2 | 01-02-2004 10:46 |