|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
This is my biggest fear when it comes to suspending from another robot. Will you be willing to trust all your hard work to another teams calculations and design?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
It seems to me that the easiest solution would be to triple or quadruple up your line. Effectively gives you a 4000 pound breaking limit instead of 1000.
We're using parachute cord (which has a breaking point of 500 pounds) and are quadrupling it. It's a lot easier to tie than spectra. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
Check out AmSteel Line. It is designed to replace stainless steel rigging on sailboats. Size for Size AmSteel is stronger then stainless, at 1/7th the weight. Plus, it is very flexible.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
Yeah, I'm actually going to West Marine Supply tomorrow to pick up some 3/16" AmSteel Blue line. Instead of the 1/8" harpoon tether cord we've been using with a breaking strength of 1050 pounds (made of Spectra A, the weaker of the UHMWPE forumlations), the new stuff will have a breaking strength of 5000 pounds and is made of Dyneema (next step up, right before Spectra B).
Thanks for all of your suggestions, and the concerns for our safety. Richard and I were fine, as we were expecting a hitch pin to break anyway, so we were holding on in a way that allowed us to both catch the robot and land on our feet. Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of using a thimble in our setup, as it would be too large, and our tensioning system uses eye loops that are welded shut, so the standard overhand knot using the loop won't work. Do you have any suggestions for the best kind of knot to use in this situation? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
Quote:
http://allaboutknots.blogspot.com/20...hitch-for.html Blake |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
Quote:
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
Quote:
FRC 111 is Wildstang FRC 1114 is Simbotics |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
And if it was 111, 1114, or 148, I'd do it in a heartbeat... (There are a few other teams, too.)
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
this is why you do not use your arm to pull up the robot.
you use something else to pull u up |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Telescoping Arm Warning
You see... I verified that on TBA.... I knew the difference... I forgot to add the 4.... Sorry about that.
Either way. 111, 148, or 1114, I would still do it in a heartbeat. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Telescoping arm | Jeff 801 | Technical Discussion | 12 | 15-06-2007 14:41 |
| Telescoping Arm | ArmoredFairy698 | Technical Discussion | 17 | 14-06-2005 11:26 |
| Chain Driven Telescoping Arm | BadKarma | Technical Discussion | 8 | 05-06-2005 12:19 |
| pic: Team 930 telescoping arm | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 1 | 13-02-2004 16:24 |
| telescoping arm | CharlieWilken | Technical Discussion | 45 | 26-01-2004 22:22 |