Go to Post Engineering is a fabulous background for many careers. - dtengineering [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Pneumatics
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 08:37
aepstein's Avatar
aepstein aepstein is offline
Registered User
FRC #2423 (KwarQs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Watertown
Posts: 12
aepstein is an unknown quantity at this point
Mechanical Regulator Movement?

Can we rig a mechanical motor to the 60psi Regulator in order to turn it during the game? We'd like to control the pressure going to the piston based on how hard a kick we need and want to do this with a motor connected to a simple turning mechanism to adjust the regulator.

Is this legal per the rules, or would this be a modification to a pneumatic system that would be disallowed.

Thanks for your insight.

_Alan
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 09:00
Unsung FIRST Hero
Mike Betts Mike Betts is offline
Electrical Engineer
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: Homosassa, FL
Posts: 1,442
Mike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

First of all, you really should ask this on the official Q&A forum at FIRST.

My opinion:

1. You must use a legal KOP motor.
2. Most inspectors will have heartburn if you motorize the primary regulator. The heartburn would come in that the motor could adjust the pressure above the specified 60 PSI. However, I think that the secondary regulator may be fair game.

Regards,

Mike
__________________
Mike Betts

Alumnus, Team 3518, Panthrobots, 2011
Alumnus, Team 177, Bobcat Robotics, 1995 - 2010
LRI, Connecticut Regional, 2007-2010
LRI, WPI Regional, 2009 - 2010
RI, South Florida Regional, 2012 - 2013

As easy as 355/113...
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 09:11
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

+1 to Mike's sentiment: Primary Regulator, no. A secondary regulator, a hesitant yes but ask Q&A, however, I can think of better ways to do it.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 09:20
aepstein's Avatar
aepstein aepstein is offline
Registered User
FRC #2423 (KwarQs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Watertown
Posts: 12
aepstein is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

I'd be most interested to hear your suggestions of secondary ways of managing this.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 11:21
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

We have in the past used multiple valves and pulsing them on and off through fancy code to achieve different speed, direction, and position of a pneumatic cylinder, including stopping a cylinder in mid-travel. You have to be a bit careful of the mechanical abilities of the valves if you plan to do this (we had one valve start producing metal shavings from being switched faster than it was rated for).

EDIT: you could also have a system where you have a cylinder A. it is connected, through two T fittings, to TWO valves, B and C. B is downstream of a regulator to 30psi. C is downstream of a regulator to 60psi. (You have to account for the return air here too somewhere.) Switch one valve, you get 30psi at the cylinder, switch the other, you get 60psi.

Another alternative is your motor-driven regulator concept, only you apply it to a flow-control fitting.

Last edited by Racer26 : 09-02-2010 at 11:24.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 13:23
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,526
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

a motor cleanly attached to a secondary regulator could actually be a much slicker setup than the multiple valves (assuming they want more than 2 positions).
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 13:48
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
a motor cleanly attached to a secondary regulator could actually be a much slicker setup than the multiple valves (assuming they want more than 2 positions).
I think you meant assuming they dont want MORE than 2 positions, if you're referring to the position of the cylinder. You can't stop a cylinder in the middle by playing with a regulator.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 14:37
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,526
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1075guy View Post
I think you meant assuming they dont want MORE than 2 positions, if you're referring to the position of the cylinder. You can't stop a cylinder in the middle by playing with a regulator.
Poor terminology on my part, I was thinking in terms of controls and meant positions as in different pressures (your system wants 5 positions, 5 different pressures...).
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 14:57
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Poor terminology on my part, I was thinking in terms of controls and meant positions as in different pressures (your system wants 5 positions, 5 different pressures...).
This is a great way to implement a variable kicker. If you have a cylinder connected to the end of your latex tubing (or other spring kicker spring) then you could get multiple kick force by simply moving your regulator knob to different positions -- in this case "positions" would indeed be the correct word because for every regulator knob position you would get a different psi in your cylinder and that would translate to a different position of your cylinder.

By the way, this could also make your cocking method simpler as well.

Imagine this:
  • Spring A moves your kicker toward retract.
  • Spring B moves your kicker toward kick and has its "fixed" end attached to a big nasty air cylinder.
  • Assume that at PSI_A the two springs are equal.
  • Assume that there is a latch that holds the kicker in the cocked position
  • Start process assuming kicker has just kicked.
Shooting process:
  1. output PSI < PSI_A, Spring A overpowers Spring B, therefore, kicker moves toward cocked
  2. Latch latches
  3. Output PSI = PSI_Desired_Kick_Energy > PSI_A, cyclinder moves the "fixed" end of Spring B in such a way as to store the appropriate amount of energy in Spring B such that it will be able to overcome Spring A AND have the right level of energy in the kicker to kick ball appropriately -- but it doesn't move because of the latch
  4. Release Latch
  5. Spring B overcomes Spring A and imparts energy into Kicker
  6. Kicker kicks ball
  7. Repeat
I like it. I like it A LOT! It provides a lot of features for not that many actuators (latch cylinder, Spring B cylinder and regulator motor)

Who's getting the official answer on this one?

Joe J.
__________________
Joseph M. Johnson, Ph.D., P.E.
Mentor
Team #88, TJ2
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure regulator Perci321 Pneumatics 13 24-01-2009 18:48
main regulator holty531 Pneumatics 2 10-02-2008 15:37
Voltage Regulator Robby Electrical 5 18-01-2005 07:50
12v regulator coreyjon Electrical 1 09-06-2004 22:08
pressure regulator blindguyinanorg Pneumatics 12 20-02-2004 08:54


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:21.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi