1/2" gap in bumpers, is this acceptable?

[Jon Stratis]

Originally Posted by Chris is me

That gap seems like the amount of space a somewhat flexible bumper could easily unintentionally leave if slightly jolted or something. Or, to be more clear, I'm pretty sure I've seen robots pass inspection without the two fabrics exactly touching all the time.

That being said, it's not too long of a fix.

Of note here - in some previous years, it was NOT required to have soft bumper material in the corners. Specifically, i know our first year (2007) we build our bumpers with no material at all in the corners, and they were perfectly legal.

Since then, we've cut all of our pool noodles at 45 degrees to fill the corners nicely.

[joek]

Originally Posted by eagle33199

Of note here - in some previous years, it was NOT required to have soft bumper material in the corners. Specifically, i know our first year (2007) we build our bumpers with no material at all in the corners, and they were perfectly legal.

Since then, we've cut all of our pool noodles at 45 degrees to fill the corners nicely.

we do too, i think. (BTW, never leave the robot supported by it's bumpers for an extended period of time, we did that to last year's bot recently, and the bumpers are squished down to half their normal size)

[3286]

I think we may be in the same boat, but there are worse possible things to have to do than fix some bumpers. In perfect hindsight and looking at the rules I can also see a disconnect between the text portion that says the bumper backing plywood is the same length as the side of the robot. ( Im paraphrasing but we all can see where this comes from ).

So if one builds the plywood to the dimension of the robot and then covers the plywood you might not get a gap in the corners but you won't necessarily get the foam and cloth covering to extend much further than the end of the backing piece either. This is basically where we are at.

You can see in the attached photos how our bumpers meet in the corners, I suppose the worse case scenario is now to open them back up and stuff a vertical piece of noodle in the corner to fill it out a bit, and then cover it back up and hope there are no gaps in the fabric.

Would be great if these are legal, but again, for us there are a lot of other and bigger fish to fry in the time remaining.



Mike

[Al Skierkiewicz]

Mike,
I am sorry to tell you this but the bumpers as pictured do not meet the rule. Specifically there are many parts to the rule but there are two parts that apply...

A. BUMPERS must provide complete protection of the entire FRAME PERIMETER of the ROBOT (i.e. BUMPERS must wrap entirely around the ROBOT). The BUMPERS must be located entirely within the BUMPER ZONE when the ROBOT is standing normally on a flat floor, and must remain there (i.e. the BUMPERS must not be articulated or designed to move outside of the BUMPER ZONE).

K. As part of the 100% coverage, BUMPERS must protect all exterior corners of the FRAME PERIMETER. For adequate protection, a full segment of BUMPER must be placed on each side of the corner (see Figure 8 - 2).

All is not lost as there is a fairly easy fix. All you need to do is add a 5" length of pool noodle, vertical orientation, at each end of the front and back bumpers covered in the fabric. This additional 2 1/2" of foam protects the corner and overlaps the adjoining bumper section. This addition must have no backing so you do not need to replace the 3/4" plywood backing. As I pointed out earlier, a little gap as shown in the first picture in this thread is expected and fits the rules that require complete frame coverage and satisfies that there are no hard parts in the corners.

[Jon Stratis]

Mike, that's a great picture of what most bumpers looked like several years ago... But last year and this year, unfortunately, it's not legal. As Al said, however, it's a fairly easy fix, provided you left enough cloth material there to cover the additional few inches.

As a real-life lesson here (adding to what vivek16 said about tolerances), can any of you think of a current, rather big issue for a major company that revolves around tolerances?

Toyota has recalled millions of cars recently due to a stuck gas pedal. Having seen videos of the procedure to fix it, the problem is one of tolerances. The pedal depresses a switch, indicating how fast the car should go by how far the switch is depressed. Well, there's a small gap between the pedal and the switch - small enough that something can get stuck in there and hold the switch down when the pedal is not being pressed. The solution? A small shim stuck in there to fill the gap and prevent anything from getting stuck there.

If the gas pedals were made to stricter tolerances, Toyota wouldn't have this problem. They wouldn't be facing a congressional inquiry, they wouldn't have had to stop sales of those vehicles (losing millions of dollars per day in the process) and spend millions of dollars fixing cars currently on the road. Tolerances are a big issue in industry - both in knowing what tolerances are acceptable for a part and in being able to meet those tolerances.

Learn from Toyota's example. In their case, a gap of 1-3mm cost them millions of dollars. Granted, we don't have to be that exact with the robots or the bumpers... but it is a valuable lesson.

[3286]

Thanks for the information. I suspected as such and we will fix them. Im not complaining about the rules per se, but I think our confusion is understandable, coming from what we viewed as a disconnect between the text and the diagram. In my humble opinion, a simple jpeg would have eliminated much confusion.

I really try to avoid lawyering up , as we put it here, about the rules and how they are interpreted. We see it a lot with students unfortunately, they will go outside the rules here at school and then instead of just modifying a behavior will spend an inordinate amount of time explaining why the rule is unfair or how come someone else gets to do this or that. After one summer of little league umpiring many years ago, I know anyone out there who has dealt with that scenario will know immediately what I mean.

Thanks much, if all our other issues were as simple as stuffing some noodle in the corner of a bumper!

Mike

[Al Skierkiewicz]

Mike,
I am glad we were able to help. We are striving to train inspectors for all competitions in the fine art of helping, rookie teams especially. I would expect that your inspector would have given you the same advice at your first competition. Good luck and have a great year.

[Chris is me]

Originally Posted by eagle33199

Of note here - in some previous years, it was NOT required to have soft bumper material in the corners. Specifically, i know our first year (2007) we build our bumpers with no material at all in the corners, and they were perfectly legal.

I'm referring to 2009 with my post, which has similar bumper rules other than allowing for cuts.

[O'Sancheski]

the one thing you have to make sure of is at the meeting point of the two bumpers, they have to form a perfect L shape..