|
|
|
 "It doesn't matter what you think happened, what the Ref calls (or doesn't) is what happened. The judgement of the Ref is part of the game, live with it or don't play." - ChrisH [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#18
11-02-2010, 11:23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: <R07>E Bumper clarification
I really believe they mean that the back of the BUMPER needs to be covered with fabric. If you look at the rule and shift your eyes over to "enclose the BUMPER backing (plywood)" I think this very clearly stated that the back of the BUMPER(part attached to the FRAME) must be covered.
This is how our team views is, this is how we made it. If you look at it from a safety point of view; having the back covered helps prevent splinters when dealing with the BUMPER. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Clarification on bumper rule... | RoboSparks | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 16-01-2010 07:29 |
| <R07> F -source for bumper fabric? | Andy Brockway | Rules/Strategy | 9 | 12-01-2010 07:36 |
| pic: R07-Bumper configuration legality | Trevor_Decker | Extra Discussion | 5 | 11-01-2010 12:20 |
| R07-Bumper configuration legality | Trevor_Decker | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 10-01-2010 18:38 |
| Your opinion: does our mesh violate rule R07?? | RoboMaster | Rules/Strategy | 9 | 16-02-2009 18:46 |
Threaded Mode