Gas Shock Legality?

[Josh Drake]

Without a lot of years of experience, I would say yes, because it has been allowed in the past.

[Tom Line]

You will need to ask the Q&A for an official answer, but if I were laying odds I'd say you've got a 90% chance of being legal. Gas shocks are no different than any other spring or elastic system, and there's never (that I'm aware of) been a prohibition on using those.

[Andrew Schreiber]

Short answer, as far as I can tell the answer is yes. Unless you can find a rule that explicitly forbids them they are legal. I believe they would fall under the same category as springs. (In cases where I need force and not velocity I prefer gas shocks for safety reasons) This is my interpretation and I would really appreciate if someone with more FRC experience (preferably on the inspector side of things) would confirm this interpretation.

Originally Posted by DRAKE343

Without a lot of years of experience, I would say yes, because it has been allowed in the past.

I happen to agree with you based on my reading of the 2010 rules but have to argue with how you came to this decision. Past years rules have no bearing this year.

[Daniel_LaFleur]

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber

Short answer, as far as I can tell the answer is yes. Unless you can find a rule that explicitly forbids them they are legal. I believe they would fall under the same category as springs. (In cases where I need force and not velocity I prefer gas shocks for safety reasons) This is my interpretation and I would really appreciate if someone with more FRC experience (preferably on the inspector side of things) would confirm this interpretation.



I happen to agree with you based on my reading of the 2010 rules but have to argue with how you came to this decision. Past years rules have no bearing this year.

<R01> Energy used by FRC ROBOTS, (i.e., stored at the start of a MATCH), shall come only from the following sources:
A. Electrical energy derived from the onboard 12V battery (see Rule <R40> for specifications and further details).
B. Compressed air stored in the pneumatic system, stored at a maximum pressure of 120 PSI in no more than four Clippard Instruments tanks. Extraneous lengths of pneumatic tubing shall not be used to increase the storage capacity of the air storage system.
C. A change in the altitude of the ROBOT center of gravity.
D. Storage achieved by deformation of ROBOT parts.

Gas shocks are legal, but the letter of the rule <R1> does not allow them to store energy at the start of the match. Bill is correct in questioning this.

Bill, I would Q&A this if I were you. Asking if they are specifically not allowing energy to be stored in gas shocks

[Karibou]

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur

Gas shocks are legal, but the letter of the rule <R1> does not allow them to store energy at the start of the match. Bill is correct in questioning this.

So would that mean that using a spring to store energy at the beginning of the match is illegal too? I would think that bending/expanding/etc a spring (or in this case, using a gas shock) of any kind would qualify as "deforming a ROBOT part."


Definitely hit up the Q&A with the question, though.

[thefro526]

Originally Posted by Karibou

So would that mean that using a spring to store energy at the beginning of the match is illegal too? I would think that bending/expanding/etc a spring (or in this case, using a gas shock) of any kind would qualify as "deforming a ROBOT part."


Definitely hit up the Q&A with the question, though.

I would agree with this too.

Can someone please bring this up in the Q&A system or point me towards an answer already posted in Q&A? We're planning on using a gas strut on our machine this year and it would be compressed (Storing Energy) at the beginning of a match...

[thefro526]

Originally Posted by Mike Betts

http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=1527

Thank you, but the above posting and answer are from 2007.

I would like to think that the ruling would be made with the same logic this year but I can't be sure... I guess we'll move forward until we hear otherwise.

[Andrew Schreiber]

Originally Posted by Mike Betts

http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=1527

Mike, I want to accept that but that was from 2007. Definitely get a Q&A ruling on this one guys.

[Mike Betts]

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber

Mike, I want to accept that but that was from 2007. Definitely get a Q&A ruling on this one guys.

Andrew,

You are correct. I am multitasking and did not notice the date...

Mike

[Alan Anderson]

Originally Posted by Karibou

I would think that bending/expanding/etc a spring (or in this case, using a gas shock) of any kind would qualify as "deforming a ROBOT part."

I can't quite convince myself that compressing a gas is a close enough equivalent to deforming a solid for <R01> to permit it as a pre-match source of stored energy. This one will definitely need an official ruling before everyone can agree on its legality.

[Mike Betts]

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur

Gas shocks are legal, but the letter of the rule <R1> does not allow them to store energy at the start of the match.

Daniel,

<R01> does explicitly permit the deformation of robot parts (part D).

See also Team Update #7 further addresses this...

Regards.

Mike

[Daniel_LaFleur]

Originally Posted by Karibou

So would that mean that using a spring to store energy at the beginning of the match is illegal too? I would think that bending/expanding/etc a spring (or in this case, using a gas shock) of any kind would qualify as "deforming a ROBOT part."


Definitely hit up the Q&A with the question, though.

Springs are a deformed part and thus are allowed under <R01-D>

Originally Posted by Mike Betts

Daniel,

<R01> does explicitly permit the deformation of robot parts (part D).

See also Team Update #7 further addresses this...

Regards.

Mike

Compressed gasses are not deformed parts, if they were then we would not need pneumatic rules.

<R01> does not specifically allow compressed gasses (other than the pneumatic system) to be used as stored energy.

Personally, I see no issue with using it as long as it was legal and safe.

Mike, If you believe that compressed gas shocks are allowed to store energy at the beginning of a match, please show me the exact rule. TU#7 does not directly address compressed gasses at all, just the safety of stored energy.

[Mike Betts]

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur

Mike, If you believe that compressed gas shocks are allowed to store energy at the beginning of a match, please show me the exact rule.

Daniel,

As you well know by now, <R72> part I is the only place that gas shocks are mentioned in this year's rules.

They are not prohibited either. That makes them a non-pneumatic robot part which, in my opinion, may be deformed IAW <R01> part D.

This is my opinion. I am not a member of the GDC.

I'm going to stop typing now...

Mike

[Rick TYler]

I don't mean to be pedantic, but I think you are discussing gas-filled springs or struts, not shocks. Shock absorbers rely on springs to support the mechanism to which they are attached, and the gas charging reduces foaming of the hydraulic fluid. Gas springs or struts rely on compressed gas to provide force, as in the struts that help support the weight of a hatchback on a car. Even if the GDC allows "gas shocks" that really isn't the same thing as a gas spring.

[Al Skierkiewicz]

I think that Daniel has the true answer here. Although gas shocks can be used on the robot, they are not specifically called out as allowed stored energy at the beginning of the match. This is a job for the GDC.