|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Team Update #11
Here's how I plan to do it:
We'll pressurize the system to cutoff with the pressure switch (around 115-120 psi), then back off the jam nut and turn the valve until it relieves. We'll go back the other way a little (1/4 turn?), jumper across the pressure switch, and watch the gauge to see where it relieves. We'll iterate from there. ... We used this method and it worked OK. You could hear the valve venting and see the pressure slow down at ~125, it went up to ~135 or less and held there until we released the pressure switch jumper; then it vented back to ~125 and stayed there. With the hysteresis on the valve I think that's about the best you can expect. Last edited by Gary Dillard : 17-02-2010 at 21:40. Reason: Added past tense |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #11
Quote:
Also hysterisis on the spring will mean your valve could pop +/- a few psi and still completely meet the manufacturers spec. I suggest looking at this value to see what it is so you don't chase your tail on the variation. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #11
Fabricated Items.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DS update | Japper | General Forum | 4 | 16-02-2009 16:59 |
| Update #14 | ChuckDickerson | General Forum | 2 | 23-02-2007 22:51 |
| Update 10 | Tomasz Bania | General Forum | 2 | 20-02-2006 22:41 |
| Update 5 | Rob Colatutto | General Forum | 2 | 27-01-2004 21:25 |