|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Labview PID
The 2010 FRC Vision Whitepaper discusses tuning the PID in the example code. The document first discusses the parallel PID formula, which has separate gains for P, I, & D, and the academic formula, which Labview uses, and which has only one gain. The coefficients of the I & D terms are time periods. The paper then discusses tuning the P, I, & D gains. Do they mean the periods for I & D? Also, when tuning the P term, the I & D terms are to be set to 0. For the I term, since the period is in the denominator, should it be set to a large value to zero out the term? How large? Or is there another way to zero out the terms?
Thanks! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labview PID
I apologize if the paper slipped up and referred to them as gains. How about coefficients?
The paper is trying to document a procedure for tuning all three coefficients. As for the meaning of zero, I didn't look at the implementation, but it seems that zero is a special value which turns off that term. After all, having an infinite term probably doesn't give a good output anyway. Greg McKaskle |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PID Control | Geek 2.0 | Programming | 16 | 12-01-2010 21:10 |
| PID: P+D or P-D | billbo911 | Programming | 1 | 27-01-2008 23:52 |
| PID | shadowops06 | Programming | 5 | 16-06-2006 22:48 |
| PID without a Ph.D. | Joe Johnson | Programming | 3 | 07-02-2006 17:37 |
| PID Control | Chris Bright | Programming | 9 | 26-03-2005 19:44 |