|
Re: NASA Grant and Chaimans
We found wording of the check-box at the start of the CA submission a little confusing:
We are submitting this only to meet the requirements of a NASA grant and do not wish to have this submission judged. As I recall from last year, there was a checkbox to indicate the submission was submitted to fulfill the NASA Grant requirement, but it wasn't combined with the "do not judge" language. I expected to see a "NASA Grant" check-box this year, but not as it was written.
We left the box unchecked, because we see real value in having our submission judged.
P.S. The essay block "unformatting" (subject of other threads) was unwelcome as well. White space is a good thing. More trees will probably need to be cut down to print reformatted submissions. 
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration
|
Are they Robots? Of course they aren't robots; they are obviously and unambiguously robots. - gblake [more] 
19-02-2010, 02:09
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode