|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
Ugh. We did all the 40 amps to the jags (there all jags...) in 14.....
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
Better to find out now when you have a few days to fix it, then at the competition.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
We don't even have any 12.
Last edited by Brandon_L : 20-02-2010 at 22:35. |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
Then use 10; you got 10 feet each of red and black in the Kit of Parts.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
Gary,
Regarding the distinction between CAPABLE and NOT INTENDED TO with respect to having balls intrude by more than 3" and whether such capability (regardless of intention) is a violation of rule <R19> (see below) - this sounds like a great question for the GDC and the formal Q&A. When I read the rules and crafted the checklist task, I interpreted the rule such that simply having the ability to intrude by > 3" was a violation of <R19>. It can get even fuzzier - I saw a few robots at Suffield Shakedown with "squishy" barriers around their robot's lower perimeter (eg rubber bands or belts). It was very easy for the robot to "hop" over a ball and trap it underneath (even though, under normal operation, the "squishy" barrier did a fine job of keep balls from being lodged under the robot). In this case, I would have been tempted to allow the robot design to pass inspection and left enforcement of the (hopefully rare) ball entrapments to the referees. A formal Q&A thread sounds like an appropriate action to take. Russ <R19> ROBOTS must be designed so that in normal operation BALLS cannot extend more than 3 inches inside a) the FRAME PERIMETER below the level of the BUMPER ZONE (see Figure 8-5), b) a MECHANISM or feature designed or used to deflect BALLS in a controlled manner that is above the level of the BUMPER ZONE. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
For those 4-H teams, have you used 4-H as your school name also?
Thank you, Trying to Help |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
Hey, I was just checking out the inspection sheet, and I noticed in the electrical catagory it said "Motors - 5 CIM, 2 Denso Left, 2 Denso Right, 2 Fisher Price, and 2 Mabuchi. <R52. A,D,E>" So I was wondering if I needed to uses 2 left and 2 right left denso motors, and not somthing like 4 left as intended? I looked at A, D, and E and what I'm doing seems to be in compliance.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Inspection Checklist posted!
Did you receive four left-side Denso window motors in your Kit of Parts? You should have received 2 lefts and 2 rights and are limited to using 2 of each per rules <R52> and <R53>.
What do you mean by using "4 left as intended"? Russ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robot Size- R11 vs. Inspection Checklist | Toby314 | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 07-01-2008 10:09 |
| Robot Inspection Checklist | ChuckDickerson | Technical Discussion | 2 | 16-02-2006 21:30 |
| Update 11 is posted, with Inspection Checklist | Tristan Lall | General Forum | 2 | 15-02-2005 21:34 |
| Inspection Checklist Draft Available | Yan Wang | General Forum | 1 | 26-02-2004 20:14 |
| Have you seen the Inspection Checklist? | Matthew_H | General Forum | 20 | 23-02-2003 19:55 |