|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Update Rate of PID Loops
Is putting PID loops in the area of the code that runs faster really that beneficial? If I recall, the 'main' portion of the loop updates at 20 hz, or every 50 milliseconds.
I took a single signals class in college and while we touched on oversampling, antialiasing, etc we didn't really dig in. In this case, I look at our 150 pound robot and think to myself that 1/20 of a second response time should be more than good enough. Is there something I'm missing? I'd love a whitepaper on this, since it seems to be one of the 'black arts' that we don't really talk about here, even though almost every team utilizes PID loops at one point or another. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tunnels in loops | krupinski | NI LabVIEW | 1 | 09-02-2009 12:08 |
| PID vs Normal loops | 3DWolf | Programming | 20 | 14-12-2007 13:41 |
| Why 26ms update rate? | bear24rw | Control System | 2 | 24-03-2007 20:39 |
| PID control loops - closed loop feedback | KenWittlief | Technical Discussion | 56 | 26-04-2004 21:27 |
| PID Control Loops | ttedrow | Programming | 7 | 05-12-2002 12:03 |