2010 Alliance Selection Results

[delsaner]

I can do NJ regional and Virginia (Former VCU) regional. I will rank the alliances from winners to QF eliminated alliances. I'll also state alliance numbers, who played who, and the teams within each alliance. May I use my version of recording?

Ex:
A1- (#, #, #)
A2- (#, #, #)
...
A8- (#, #, #)

A1- W
A2- F (lost to A1)
A3- SF (lost to A2)
A4- SF (lost to A1)
A5- QF (lost to A4)
A6- QF (lost to A3)
A7- QF (lost to A2)
A8- QF (lost to A1)

[Karthik]

Originally Posted by delsaner

I can do NJ regional and Virginia (Former VCU) regional. I will rank the alliances from winners to QF eliminated alliances. I'll also state alliance numbers, who played who, and the teams within each alliance. May I use my version of recording?

Ex:
A1- (#, #, #)
A2- (#, #, #)
...
A8- (#, #, #)

A1- W
A2- F (lost to A1)
A3- SF (lost to A2)
A4- SF (lost to A1)
A5- QF (lost to A4)
A6- QF (lost to A3)
A7- QF (lost to A2)
A8- QF (lost to A1)

Hey Eric,

Thanks for offering to help! I'd prefer it if you used the format that I described (it displays all the info that you'd post, since FIRST uses a consistent bracket, e.g. 1v8, 4v5, 2v7, 3v6), but ultimately it's up to you. As long as we get the information of who was selected in the proper order, it's all good.

[Andrew Schreiber]

Karthik, as this is part of the FiM scoring it should all be available on the FiM website. (As I recall that is Jim Zondag having people text it to him as the events go) we had planned on seeing if we could consistently figure it out based on the data on FIRST's website. I will definitely let you know if I get that running.

[Karthik]

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber

Karthik, as this is part of the FiM scoring it should all be available on the FiM website. (As I recall that is Jim Zondag having people text it to him as the events go) we had planned on seeing if we could consistently figure it out based on the data on FIRST's website. I will definitely let you know if I get that running.

Thanks, Andrew. Last year the FiM events were the easiest for us to get the results for as everything was displayed correctly on their website. If you can figure out how to automate the process from the results on the FIRST website, that would be amazing.

[Andrew Schreiber]

Originally Posted by Karthik

Thanks, Andrew. Last year the FiM events were the easiest for us to get the results for as everything was displayed correctly on their website. If you can figure out how to automate the process from the results on the FIRST website, that would be amazing.

On a related note, I do plan on getting FRCFeed back up, hopefully tomorrow night (if FIRST puts up some data for me to test with) so it will hopefully automate your collection of match data too. I'll work with Clinton on getting the automated alliance stuff up hopefully by next week.

[delsaner]

Originally Posted by Karthik

Hey Eric,

Thanks for offering to help! I'd prefer it if you used the format that I described (it displays all the info that you'd post, since FIRST uses a consistent bracket, e.g. 1v8, 4v5, 2v7, 3v6), but ultimately it's up to you. As long as we get the information of who was selected in the proper order, it's all good.

No problem! I'll use your method, but I will re-arrange it with my method

Ex:

A2) W (#,#,#)
A6) F (#,#,#)
etc...

[JamesBrown]

Originally Posted by delsaner

No problem! I'll use your method, but I will re-arrange it with my method

Ex:

A2) W (#,#,#)
A6) F (#,#,#)
etc...

I don't know for sure but I would assume that Karthik is looking for people to use his format so it is easier to paste into Excel (or parse and use for whatever he wants to use it for)


With a standard format he can just copy and paste the block and every regional will look the same, If the format is different (even if it is only slightly different) the data becomes more difficult to parse and cannot be simply copied and pasted into Excel.



-James

[Vikesrock]

FLR will be edited in as soon as it is complete. I can add final finish later in the day, but I had to get these up here to get my shot at gear

Event: Peachtree 2010

1)1466 1771 1683
2)3214 2918 3404
3)1848 34 3139
4)1746 1261 1758
5)547 1414 1648
6)1127 590 2967
7)2974 832 2415
8)281 2655 1379

Event: Finger Lakes 2010

1)1551 217 174
2)145 1241 250
3)3173 229 378
4)1511 3157 578
5)1559 1507 291
6)188* 610 191
7)2852 639 340
8)63 1126 2053

*Declined 3173

[Chris is me]

Event: Greater Kansas City 2010
1) 2345 525 931 W
2) 1625 16 2410 F (I still can't believe it either)
3) 1209 1825 2335 QF
4) 1785 1986 1730 SF
5) 1094 1997 1806 QF
6) 2461 935 1763 SF
7) 234 868 1982 QF
8) 932 1810 1208 QF

RTFG cheated and posted a partial alliance before the event was done selecting D: that's no fair

[kwotremb]

Traverse City District:

1) 1918 - 2645 - 1254 (Winners)
2) 2771 - 107 - 3098
3) 2474 - 3115 - 835 (Semis)
4) 85 - 830 - 2586 (Semis)
5) 3357 - 3234 - 858
6) 904 - 74 - 1711
7) 2959 - 66 - 2246 (Finalist)
8) 141 - 2245 - 2000

[engunneer]

Originally Posted by danshaffer

Autodesk Oregon Regional

1) 997, 2130, 1515
2) 753 2192 2733
3) 847, 2990, 2471
4) 8, 1983, 2046
5) 2374, 3145, 488
6) 2002, 958, 3192
7) 3185, 360, 2557
8) 1540, 368, 2811

(sorry if there are typos, let me know and I will fix them)

Originally Posted by Dave McLaughlin

Should be 2046.

I have some corrections to Oregon, the above are not listed in cap, 1, 2 order, and don't have the W,QF,SF,F of Karthik's format

Event: Oregon 2010

1.) 997 2130 1515 W
2.) 753 2733 2192 SF
3.) 847 2471 2990 F
4.) 8 1983 2046 SF
5.) 3192 2002 956 QF
6.) 1540 2811 368 QF
7.) 2557 360 3165 QF
8.) 3145 2374 488 QF

2002 was #7 seed
2811 was #8 seed
No declines

[penguinfrk]

Originally Posted by engunneer

I have some corrections to Oregon, the above are not listed in cap, 1, 2 order, and don't have the W,QF,SF,F of Karthik's format

Event: Oregon 2010

1.) 997 2130 1515 W
2.) 753 2733 2192 SF
3.) 847 2471 2990 F
4.) 8 1983 2046 SF
5.) 3192 2002 956 QF
6.) 1540 2811 368 QF
7.) 2557 360 3165 QF
8.) 3145 2374 488 QF

2002 was #7 seed
2811 was #8 seed
No declines

Modification on 7:

Event: Oregon Autodesk Regional

1.) 997 2130 1515 W
2.) 753 2733 2192 SF
3.) 847 2471 2990 F
4.) 8 1983 2046 SF
5.) 3192 2002 956 QF
6.) 1540 2811 368 QF
7.) 2557 360 3165* QF
8.) 3145 2374 488 QF

2002 was #7 seed
2811 was #8 seed
No declines
*1510 replaced 3165 for QF3-3

[Michael Corsetto]

Peachtree Regional

1.) 1466 1771 1683
2.) 3214 2918 3404
3.) 1848 34 3139
4.) 1746 1261 1758
5.) 547 1414 1648
6.) 1127 590 2967
7.) 2974 832 2415
8.) 281 2655 1379

Will update with W/L later.