|
|
|
 Has anybody seen our programmer? He was last sighted walking southbound in the rain, his laptop tucked under his arm, grumbling to himself. - Taylor [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Has anybody seen our programmer? He was last sighted walking southbound in the rain, his laptop tucked under his arm, grumbling to himself. - Taylor [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#15
06-03-2010, 12:48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weird Qualifying Rules
I think that the QP are flawed
My example of this was yesterday at the DC regional. Blue Alliance barely moved the whole match. Red Alliance beats the Blue alliance 8-0. The Red Alliance had 1 penalty so there unpenalized score was 9. According to the rules, Red Alliance gets 8 QPs and Blue Alliance gets 9 QPs even though they lost by 8. Just wanted to point that out. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Late Qualifying | K. Skontrianos | Championship Event | 13 | 13-12-2002 14:59 |
| Looking back at the Nats qualifying rules... | patrickrd | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 09-04-2002 16:12 |
| Qualifying Pairings | Steve Shade | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 10-03-2002 10:04 |
| Qualifying Points | M.I. | General Forum | 1 | 02-02-2002 12:49 |
| Finals Qualifying | Prothe | General Forum | 6 | 11-01-2002 21:24 |
Threaded Mode