|
|
|
 Just think outside the box but inside the 28" X 38" X 60" rectangular prism and you may come up with a solution. - Pavan Dave [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Just think outside the box but inside the 28" X 38" X 60" rectangular prism and you may come up with a solution. - Pavan Dave [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#15
07-03-2010, 13:38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ranking
I understand that they want to find a better way of ranking seeding points but this just seems too full of political correctness of trying to make everyone feel good. Kind of the new scoring rules of t-ball. Everyone wins so no one feels bad.
A better way can surely be found. Believe me, our team has had years when our bot did great but the alliances we were in just didn't do well. So, even though we did well individually we have been seeded low on the list. We ended up getting picked for alliances in the quarter finals anyway most of the time. Because of profiling, this happens quite often. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ranking score? | jasper.s.jacobs | General Forum | 6 | 22-04-2008 08:53 |
| Ranking Points | IndySam | Rules/Strategy | 0 | 07-01-2008 11:13 |
| Ranking | D.Bear | Championship Event | 4 | 20-04-2007 16:17 |
| ranking at BEA | sburro | Regional Competitions | 0 | 07-03-2006 18:47 |
| Ranking database. | Josh Hambright | General Forum | 9 | 11-03-2003 09:05 |
Threaded Mode