|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
How should I put it that it shows that those people were alliance captains but were chosen to be apart of another alliance?
|
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
You can still use the asterisks, you just put them in the middle.
|
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Alright. Thank you, I'll correct it.
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
The CORRECT version
Bayou City Regional 1)1912 231 256QF 2)1421 2992* 3364 W 3)2587* 1927* 3228 QF 4)2078 1477 364 SF 5)2091 1339* 2190 QF 6)3411 57 3039 SF 7)2920 2242 2973 QF 8)2221* 1920 2080 F * was seeded 5 * declined by 2078 * was seeded 8 after 2992 * was seeded 8 after 1927 * was seeded 8 after 1339 Let me know if you find anything I have wrong |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
My sheet got lost in the fray of cleaning up after alliance selection, so I can't correct exactly. But I don't think this list is 100% accurate. I'm pretty sure 1829 was 45's first selection.
|
|
#37
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
I was more certain of 3373 being 45's first pick because I remember Blair making a comment about the vets picking the rookies in the first round. 1829 did play the midfield which is rare for a 3rd bot, but I figured that decision was to allow 1829 to try to hang. Again, this is from memory so there is a good chance you are right
|
|
#38
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
New Jersey
1)25 1676 3059 2)422 2016 816 3)303* 56 2495 4)709 293 41 5)1923 2753 2180 6)1672 11 2344 7)1279 223 1089 8)870** 102 2458 *Declined team 422 **Declined team 709 |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
New Jersey
1. 25/1676/3059 2. 422/2016/816 3. 303*/56/2495 4. 709/293/41 5. 1923/2753/2180 6. 1672/11/2344 7. 1279/223/1089 8. 870#/102/2458 *Declined 422 #Declined 708 |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
New Jersey
1) 25 1676 3059 W 2) 422 2016 816 F 3) 303 56 2495 SF 4) 709 293 41 QF 5) 1923 2753 2180 SF 6) 1672 11 2344 QF 7) 1279 223 1089 QF 8) 870 102 2458 QF Last edited by ATannahill : 07-03-2010 at 17:51. |
|
#41
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
New Jersey Regional
1.) 25 1676 3059 W 2.) 422 2016 816 F 3.) 303* 56 2495 SF 4.) 709 293 41 QF 5.) 1923 2753 2180 SF 6.) 1672 11 2344 QF 7.) 1279 223 1089 QF 8.) 870** 102 2458 QF * declined team 422 ** declined team 709 I'll post results as they come in. EDIT: Somebody beat me to it. EDIT 2: now it's offical Last edited by Nawaid Ladak : 07-03-2010 at 17:32. |
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Traverse City District:
1) 1918 - 2645 - 1254 (Winners) 2) 2771 - 107 - 3098 3) 2474 - 3115 - 835 (Semis) 4) 85 - 830 - 2586 (Semis) 5) 3357 - 3234 - 858 6) 904 - 74 - 1711 7) 2959 - 66 - 2246 (Finalist) 8) 141 - 2245 - 2000 |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
Event: Oregon 2010 1.) 997 2130 1515 W 2.) 753 2733 2192 SF 3.) 847 2471 2990 F 4.) 8 1983 2046 SF 5.) 3192 2002 956 QF 6.) 1540 2811 368 QF 7.) 2557 360 3165 QF 8.) 3145 2374 488 QF 2002 was #7 seed 2811 was #8 seed No declines |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
It should be 3411 3039 57.
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
I know this mostly is relevant to last year, as this year's data is already here, but FiM keeps a record of who picks who, as it is part of the State competition qualifying algorithm. If you need last year's data, I'm sure someone with strong ties to FiM can find that data (I have seen it in a spreadsheet before, I just don't happen to have it).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Denying an Alliance Selection | Magnechu | General Forum | 56 | 03-04-2008 13:04 |
| New alliance selection method | Bharat Nain | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 08-01-2006 22:16 |
| [OCCRA]: CMP Alliance Selection | Alex Golec | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 14-11-2005 18:20 |
| Alliance Selection 2005- Like it? | OneAngryDaisy | Rules/Strategy | 42 | 14-03-2005 14:59 |
| Alliance Selection Clarification | Bill Beatty | Off-Season Events | 1 | 11-11-2001 07:11 |