Go to Post If said device costs 10x more to manufacture than a simpler solution integrating COTS parts, and only performs 10% better, that's poor engineering. - Cory [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: score's lower,higher or what you expected
higher then I expected 7 4.52%
what I expected 57 36.77%
lower then I expected 91 58.71%
Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 16:21
Tetraman's Avatar
Tetraman Tetraman is offline
FIRST on my mind
AKA: Evan Raitt
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,322
Tetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2010 week 1 low scores

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post
Is it possible that FIRST has expanded the number of teams so quickly that the average level of robot competency has dropped?
It's possible, but this year is a very different year, as stated by the next thing you said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post
It is also possible that the rules this year prohibit a team from building an uber-capable, ultra-dominant robot of the kind that 1114 built for Overdrive.
Yes. It is very possible, and I think it's the case, though I'm not ready to pass judgment. I actually find this year to be a lot more cumbersome then it needs to be. Imagine if the tunnel was wider and there was less bump, so the platform could hold two robots rather then one. That would change the game SO much.
__________________
"For every great theory about design, there is a better and contradictory theory about design. And don't let the irony of that escape you."

Last edited by Tetraman : 07-03-2010 at 16:23.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 17:14
Jstack14 Jstack14 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: kansas
Posts: 43
Jstack14 is infamous around these parts
Re: 2010 week 1 low scores

In general from what i saw teams struggled with balls getting stuck on the edge of the wall and they could not get it from their to the goal easy. A big challenge is the simple fact that they are driving toward themselves. THis is making it hard to judge robots in the front zone. On top of this deffensive bots are making it impossible for teams to score unlesss they have an effective way to control the ball. In general people overestimated how quickly they could kick and score. Accuracy is low in comparison to what it could be and i have a feeling teams underextimated how easy it is for a ball to bounce out. Mteams aren't hanging, which is fine, but they can't score two points in the last twenty seconds like they thought they could. Also teams aren't allowing enough time to hang becuase some get almost all the way up but time runs out.....

I was at the KC regional and overall saw a lack of team work among bots. In autonomus so many bots blocked teamates shots. If your bot is not accurate in autonomus, then don't risks blocking your teams. Also there was minimal passing. A sound strategy would be clearing all the balls from the middle zone into your scoring end then crossing the buymp for a two on 1 in your scoring zone. This makes the deffensive bot only able to block one scorer and the other can just push balls in. Also it virtually eliminates the middle player becasue he can't do anything with a very small numebr of balls. Finally the defender can't clear all the balls if there are two attacking robots, and if you delay your ball re turn by makign it roll slow, your alliance won't be scored on to much. Strategies like this are worth considering but it seems that no one used strategy, they just played their game their way.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 18:12
Dr Theta's Avatar
Dr Theta Dr Theta is offline
Lead Mentor
AKA: Derek Messer
FRC #2232 (Deus Ex Machina)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Anoka, Minnesota
Posts: 351
Dr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud ofDr Theta has much to be proud of
Re: 2010 week 1 low scores

I personally have been surprised by overall lack of a cohesive strategy between alliance partners, many matches that I saw in qualification rounds appeared to demonstrate a lack of communication in either pregame strategy or in-game between drivers. It looked like a lot of individuals rather than an alliance.
__________________
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 18:18
annie1939's Avatar
annie1939 annie1939 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ann Fairburn
FRC #4388 (Ridgebotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Fort Collins,CO
Posts: 58
annie1939 has a spectacular aura aboutannie1939 has a spectacular aura aboutannie1939 has a spectacular aura about
Re: 2010 week 1 low scores

Towards the end of the qualifying matches, one of our alliances decided to go for coopertition points. Our driver had been hesitant to try the idea earlier, but everyone had been talking about it during the day. So the teams decided to try it. Nothing else was working. Five robots were trying to get balls into the same goals. One opponent robot stayed on defense. They still only managed 3 points and 2 were from our alliance. It was very frustrating.

Ball handling is an interesting engineering problem, but that subtlety is lost on the audience. We also need games with the drama to draw them in, and I don't think they got it right this year. The finals were more exciting, but for the first day and a half it was about missed kicks and trying to get balls out of the corners.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 21:52
Enigma's puzzle's Avatar
Enigma's puzzle Enigma's puzzle is offline
Strategery
AKA: Matt Brechting
FRC #2075 (Enigma)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sparta MI
Posts: 261
Enigma's puzzle is a splendid one to beholdEnigma's puzzle is a splendid one to beholdEnigma's puzzle is a splendid one to beholdEnigma's puzzle is a splendid one to beholdEnigma's puzzle is a splendid one to beholdEnigma's puzzle is a splendid one to beholdEnigma's puzzle is a splendid one to behold
Re: 2010 week 1 low scores

Balls that roll into th wall are near impossible to get without a magnet, and good ball handling devices were few and far between. Way to go for anyone that got the ball magnet down, and if you don't, I hope you have weight because i think for week 3 and beyond I think it will be as tough to get selected in an alliance if you dont have a handling mechanism. About as hard as getting the ball away from the wall without a mechanism.
__________________

  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 22:46
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,605
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2010 week 1 low scores

Our robot, by just being a large, flat front, was able to motor balls away from the wall much easier than other teams. The memory foam in front of our kicker also stops balls from bouncing off of us. In fact, I would call it a passive ball control system, as opposed to an active one, such as the vacuum at FLR.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Robotics Week 2010 April 10-18 RoboMom General Forum 2 12-04-2010 13:09
pic: Team 1322 2010 Robot Start Week 3 joeweber Extra Discussion 14 02-02-2010 18:04
Week 1 High Scores Cuse Regional Competitions 15 01-03-2009 23:09
Predictions Week 4: Bash Fests in Boston, San Diego & Waterloo. Big Scores @ Buckeye Joe Johnson General Forum 51 28-03-2007 12:36
Scores? We've got your scores right here... archiver 2000 2 23-06-2002 22:27


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi