|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
High scores will be happening in elims and rarely in qualifying.
With 0 points scored in autonomous and no hanging robots our alliance at Cass Tech, 217, 469 and 2960, were able to score 26 points using 7 of the 12 balls on the field. This is with one robot doing nothing but defense against the other teams robot in our home zone. If 217 and 469 would have had a perfect auton we would have gotten 30. Our alliance did have a near perfect auton in an earlier match, 5 balls in auton, but that was in the quarter finals. I believe that 30 points will be broken this year. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
If 469 can continue to implement their strategy (GDC doesn't limit them somehow), I predict them playing on Einstein and a match including them reaching 35 points. Given what happened at Cass Tech, I'm willing to make this post on Delphi without feeling like an utter fool. Eager to see them play in Atlanta!
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Sorry, my comment was rather unclear - I think that 469 will both compete on Einstein and score a 35 point match; however, I really doubt that these will happen at the same time! I do understand that to score 35 points necessitates scoring a ball every 4 seconds for the entire match, assuming you get 5 points in auto or through hanging on the tower. This means that the single Trident-wielder needs to be putting a ball up at an average rate of one ball every 4 seconds - a truly incredible rate, particularly to sustain for over 2 minutes! So, yes, I do understand how bold my statement was... To be honest, though, I don't see the point in making a "prediction" unless it's a little controversial! For example, predicting a 30 point match hardly seems hard to believe, after 469's astounding "marble run!"
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
It's only week 2... I'm sure there are at least a few other ball redirecting robots we haven't seen yet.
Last edited by Tom Bottiglieri : 14-03-2010 at 22:33. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
And if (but being a Car Nack prediction isn't it when?) this happens the human player play would have to be as impressive as the actual feat itself, i'd have to imagine. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Week 4 ... Boston?!? Akash, you said you were making changes, but I didn't expect this!
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
I know Tom will be laughing at this post when he reads it. Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 15-03-2010 at 00:08. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
I'm not saying 469's robot isn't wonderful (because it is). I just try not to count my chicks before they hatch. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
The 254 robot has both 469 style shoots and a 217 style kicker. It dominates as usual. I believe they scored well over 37 points at their scrimmage... alone!
![]() It also has a claw that can be used to forcibly grab alliance partners and lift them into the air for 3 pt bonuses. ...and it flys. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2010-4
Into all four goals.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Car Nack Predicts 2010-1 | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 46 | 25-04-2010 19:17 |
| Car Nack Predicts 01/07 | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 18 | 25-04-2007 08:51 |
| Car Nack Predicts 1/06 | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 13 | 05-04-2006 08:02 |
| Car Nack Predicts 3/06 | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 39 | 28-02-2006 22:19 |
| Car Nack Predicts #2 | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 1 | 06-02-2004 12:48 |