|
|
|
 Getting a swerve to drive predictably and effectively is arguably harder than designing and building it.
- Holtzman [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Getting a swerve to drive predictably and effectively is arguably harder than designing and building it.
- Holtzman [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
14-03-2010, 21:00
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?
Read the team update that specifically allowed their design. It was one of the last updates. They got called for one active penalty as they were moving their flipper when a ball touched it. Other than that one incident (the drive coach had to do push-ups), the machine is perfectly legal.
I was at Cass Tech, I saw their robot, and I am familiar with the rule. They are perfectly legal according to the rules and updates. You have to see it to believe it. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Checking <R19> | Creator Mat | Rules/Strategy | 7 | 13-02-2010 16:13 |
| R19 | MarcusF | Rules/Strategy | 12 | 09-01-2010 21:49 |
| Your opinion: does our mesh violate rule R07?? | RoboMaster | Rules/Strategy | 9 | 16-02-2009 18:46 |
| Project does not build | team 803 | Programming | 5 | 27-02-2006 17:03 |
| Program does not end | NNSWIZ | Programming | 4 | 21-03-2005 22:33 |
Threaded Mode