|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Was this useful? | |||
| Yes, it was! It helped point out diamonds in the rough |
|
109 | 70.32% |
| No, its numbers generally did not correspond to robot's actual on-field performance |
|
46 | 29.68% |
| Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did the OPR miss the mark for the Florida Regional? The alliance of 1251 + 1612 + 86 won the whole shebang with a combined OPR of 5.4 versus alliances with group OPRs of 9.9, 9.2, 7.1, 6.4, 5.6, 5.2, and 5.10. If OPR were a good predictor wouldn't the team of 1592 + 179 + 3164 be a virtual lock with a group OPR of 9.9? In the past OPR usually was a good indicator of the strongest alliance in the elimination rounds. In the Quarterfinals, the top three teams by group OPR were knocked off.
Last edited by Jacob Plicque : 16-03-2010 at 16:45. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Offensive Power Ranking Calculations | Greg Marra | General Forum | 4 | 18-03-2009 22:03 |
| Offensive Power Rankings for 2008 | Bongle | General Forum | 166 | 18-05-2008 15:05 |
| Offensive+Defensive Power Rankings | BornaE | General Forum | 4 | 05-04-2008 01:33 |
| 2006 Offensive Power Ratings | sw293 | General Forum | 16 | 10-05-2006 17:04 |
| (CURIE) Let's make this Easy for all of us. [scouting] | 157#1Driver | Championship Event | 13 | 22-04-2002 08:56 |