Go to Post Seniors, do you realize this is your last robot season?! - atomikitten [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 14:02
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,029
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Some of the NERDS were helping team 3194 at the Arizona regional. One problem they had was with drive chains falling off. The robot is pretty simple, it uses a kit chassis, with AM mecanum wheels driven with the kit style toughbox and mounting design, one motor and transmission per wheel.

The design of the chassis, transmission mounts, and wheel towers allows some flexing. This is made worse when the towers are cut away for wheel clearance.

I helped the team analyze the problem, and this is the fix they came up with. Simple, effective.

Also, notice the sleeve in the picture, this is the best dressed team I've ever seen! (Thanks to their sponsor JC Penny)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	brace.jpg
Views:	583
Size:	60.0 KB
ID:	8892  
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 14:08
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,731
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Nice fix. I vote two bolt holes on the toughbox side of the brace to remove that last degree of freedom, but it's likely overkill in this situation.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 14:19
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Flex + Mecanum = good

But it looks like they had too much of a good thing. Putting that bar essentially along the chain path is a wonderful solution. It keeps the distance between sprockets from changing, which is exactly what they needed.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 14:46
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,833
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

A nice fix... and we found the flex helped our mecanum keep all four wheels on the ground a few years back... but then again, we were using direct drive.

The extended output shafts from AM and Banebots make it easy to mount wheels directly on the gearbox (so long as the outboard end of the shaft is supported, at least) and, while it does reduce some of your options in terms of gearing and drive geometry, it ensures that you will always have at least one wheel turning on your robot!

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 14:54
Marc P. Marc P. is offline
I fix stuff.
AKA: βetamarc
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Watertown, CT
Posts: 997
Marc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond reputeMarc P. has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Marc P.
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

The kit chassis flex isn't limited to just mecanum. Using two 8" kit rubber treaded wheels in front, and two 8" kit plastic treaded wheels in back, our wheel supports flexed and bent enough for our chain to pop off 3 matches in a row.

Everything seemed to work fine for our first 5 matches, no issues with chain or driving. After that 5th match, and what we now suspect was a rather fast/hard landing while traversing the bump, we noticed our drive chains started losing tension. We tried compensating by raising our idler shafts to maintain proper tension, but during each of our next 3 matches, the chain still popped off within the first 30 seconds. We even tried removing a link, and tensioning to the point where it was almost too tight, but the chain still managed to fall off.

During this process, we noticed our front right side wheel axle wasn't straight. Looking closer we saw the outside of the wheel support had bent towards the center of the frame by almost half an inch. We managed to straighten it as best we could, but in the next match the chain popped off again, and the wheel support was bent in the same direction, after carefully and slowly driving over the bump. We're actively working on a method of reinforcing the wheel supports to keep this from happening again at the Connecticut Regional, and some form of c-channel between the axle and frame seems to be the quickest, lightest, and most durable solution. If we have enough time, we may try to design entirely new wheel supports, with a more reinforcing angle between the wheel axle and the center of the frame.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 16:44
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,029
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Most of the flexibility stems from the fact that all the parts are channels, there are no box sections. Consider putting a plate across the open side of the wheel support tower, firmly attached to both sides at several places. This might prevent the towers from being able to twist. When the wheel (and sprocket) are at an angle, the chain will want to pop off.

Also look into adding the tubular link between the transmission and axle, as shown in the picture.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 20:55
gwsuter's Avatar
gwsuter gwsuter is offline
Registered User
FRC #2439 (Bearbotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: maui
Posts: 2
gwsuter is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

We were at the same regional and were throwing chains like crazy (lost six points in on match dragging the chain around behind our bot). Wish we had talked with you. Is that brace made out of EMT? We may try this approach along with some home made chain guards at our home regional on the 25th.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-07-2010, 19:39
buildmaster5000 buildmaster5000 is offline
Trying to program the swerve drive
AKA: Alex
FRC #2421 (Rolling Thunder Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 207
buildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud of
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

This is sort of changing th subject, but my team had trouble getting chain to stay on this year, but it hasn't been an issue before. Do the highly intelligent people on CD think that it is because the wheels were on the kit standoffs and those flexed enought to allow the chain to pop off?

thanks!
__________________
-Alex



2010 Washington DC Regional: Engineering Excellence Award
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-07-2010, 19:49
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,029
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

That would be my guess.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-07-2010, 19:56
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,768
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Multiple teams I know of had this problem.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
--2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
.
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
-- 2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design -- 2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
-- 2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
-- 2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 MN 10K Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-07-2010, 22:30
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,976
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Quote:
Originally Posted by buildmaster5000 View Post
This is sort of changing th subject, but my team had trouble getting chain to stay on this year, but it hasn't been an issue before. Do the highly intelligent people on CD think that it is because the wheels were on the kit standoffs and those flexed enought to allow the chain to pop off?

thanks!
Not enough information to make this assessment.

Yes, the pods could have contributed to the chains popping off, but thats not proof. Many teams (mine included, without tensioners) ran chains to the wheel pods without a chain ever popping off.

Can you give us more info about your chain routing/tensioning? maybe even a picture?
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-07-2010, 02:03
blayde5's Avatar
blayde5 blayde5 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Abhi
FRC #3504 (Girls of Steel)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 71
blayde5 is a glorious beacon of lightblayde5 is a glorious beacon of lightblayde5 is a glorious beacon of lightblayde5 is a glorious beacon of lightblayde5 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

At SD and SVR, I saw many problems like this. I had tried to help out a team using the kit chassis. They couldn't get their chain on because the standoffs had bent too much. And whenever they did get the chain connected, it came off during a match because the standoffs would always flex too much.

It was one of the reasons our team chose not to use something like the KOP standoffs to mount our four wheels.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-07-2010, 22:26
buildmaster5000 buildmaster5000 is offline
Trying to program the swerve drive
AKA: Alex
FRC #2421 (Rolling Thunder Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 207
buildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud of
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur View Post
Not enough information to make this assessment.

Yes, the pods could have contributed to the chains popping off, but thats not proof. Many teams (mine included, without tensioners) ran chains to the wheel pods without a chain ever popping off.

Can you give us more info about your chain routing/tensioning? maybe even a picture?
We ran a 6wd with chan runnning from the gearbox to the back wheel (we got these to be tight enough and it might have fallen off once). From the back wheel to the middle wheel was the problem, even with the AM tensioner on it, it consistnetly fell off and we could never solve it). From the middle, the chain went to the front wheel, which was very tight and we never had a problem.

Unfortunatly, I do not have a good picture. The one I attached is the best I could find. The lower set of wheels shows the gearbox through the middle wheel. The upper set shows the front wheels, which were not a problem.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5865.JPG
Views:	51
Size:	127.5 KB
ID:	9199  
__________________
-Alex



2010 Washington DC Regional: Engineering Excellence Award
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-07-2010, 06:50
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,976
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Kit Chassis + Mecanum = Flex

Quote:
Originally Posted by buildmaster5000 View Post
We ran a 6wd with chan runnning from the gearbox to the back wheel (we got these to be tight enough and it might have fallen off once). From the back wheel to the middle wheel was the problem, even with the AM tensioner on it, it consistnetly fell off and we could never solve it). From the middle, the chain went to the front wheel, which was very tight and we never had a problem.

Unfortunatly, I do not have a good picture. The one I attached is the best I could find. The lower set of wheels shows the gearbox through the middle wheel. The upper set shows the front wheels, which were not a problem.
I saw setups like this on a number of teams that had chain issues (and actually saw 25 chain breaking).

From what I could gather the AM Traction (Plaction?) wheels, with the tread attached, has a slightly larger circumference than the other wheels. Since both have good traction (.9+ CoF) the difference in distance traveled causes the chain to jump over time (~ 1 minute into matches). Try putting slick wheels, or zipties (Lower CoF) on the front wheels (the set chained only to the middle)
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NYC Team Looking for AM Kit Chassis Ice Berg General Forum 0 09-02-2010 18:38
Wood Chassis vs. Kit Frame Chris Fultz Technical Discussion 30 25-03-2009 19:58
Kit bot wheels and chassis assembly Transporter1717 General Forum 3 09-01-2008 19:51
pic: Team XBot Mecanum Practice Chassis Fred Sayre Technical Discussion 28 22-11-2006 09:21
pic: Practice Mecanum Chassis Madison Extra Discussion 39 10-09-2006 20:17


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi