Go to Post Gee, I wonder if AndyMark has a wedding gift registry? - KathieK [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 15:46
Russ Beavis Russ Beavis is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Manchester, NH - DEKA R&D Corp.
Posts: 341
Russ Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond reputeRuss Beavis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Check out G30.C

<G30> ROBOT Volume – During a MATCH, no part of the ROBOT shall extend outside the vertical projection of the FRAME PERIMETER, except as follows:
a. BALL Interaction Volume – Solely for the purposes of interacting with a BALL, MECHANISMS that are below the BUMPER may extend up to the BUMPER PERIMETER, for a period not exceeding two seconds. After returning inside the FRAMER PERIMETER, such MECHANISMS are not permitted to re-extend beyond the FRAME PERIMETER for at least two seconds.
b. ROBOT Righting Volume - ROBOTS attempting to right themselves or their ALLIANCE partners may expand up to the FINALE CONFIGURATION maximum volume while, and only while, performing the righting operation. While beyond the NORMAL CONFIGURATION volume and righting, ROBOTS may not actively interact with BALLS or opponent ROBOTS.
c. TOWER Contact ROBOT Volume - During a MATCH, ROBOTS in contact with their ALLIANCE TOWER may extend beyond their NORMAL CONFIGURATION volume but may not exceed the FINALE CONFIGURATION maximum volume.
  #62   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 15:46
Vikesrock's Avatar
Vikesrock Vikesrock is offline
Team 2175 Founder
AKA: Kevin O'Connor
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 3,305
Vikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Vikesrock Send a message via MSN to Vikesrock Send a message via Yahoo to Vikesrock
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John G View Post
The finale period only has rules about the last 20 seconds. So can any robot expand without bound ( up to the field perimeter) until the last 20 seconds, or am I over analyzing this? The rules only prevent you from being outside the frame limits when the match starts and the finale, but nothing about the middle 100 seconds.
No, robots are always bound by one of two volume limitations, the NORMAL CONFIGURATION or the FINALE CONFIGURATION.

469 uses <G30-c> to expand to the FINALE CONFIGURATION before the FINALE

Quote:
<G30> ROBOT Volume – During a MATCH, no part of the ROBOT shall extend outside the vertical projection of the FRAME PERIMETER, except as follows:
...
c. TOWER Contact ROBOT Volume - During a MATCH, ROBOTS in contact with their ALLIANCE TOWER may extend beyond their NORMAL CONFIGURATION volume but may not exceed the FINALE CONFIGURATION maximum volume.
...
__________________


2007 Wisconsin Regional Highest Rookie Seed & Regional Finalists (Thanks 930 & 2039)
2008 MN Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 2472 & 1756)
2009 Northstar Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 171 & 525)
  #63   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 15:53
John G John G is offline
Registered User
FRC #0399 (Eagle Robotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 72
John G is on a distinguished road
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Ok. Thank you. Isn't their still an x amount of time where the are extended past the frame perimeter and not in contact with the tower though, being a penalty, or not, as long as they touch the tower within 5 seconds? (it appears to me that for half a second or so, when their ball controller is rasing up, they extend past 5ft and are not in contact with the tower yet)

Last edited by John G : 16-03-2010 at 15:59.
  #64   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 15:56
Vikesrock's Avatar
Vikesrock Vikesrock is offline
Team 2175 Founder
AKA: Kevin O'Connor
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 3,305
Vikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Vikesrock Send a message via MSN to Vikesrock Send a message via Yahoo to Vikesrock
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John G View Post
Ok. Thank you. Isn't their an x amount of time where the are extended past the frame perimeter and not incontact with the tower, being a penalty, or not as long as they touch the tower within 5 seconds?
They drive partially underneath the tunnel and contact the tower before unfolding any of their mechanism from the video I have seen.
__________________


2007 Wisconsin Regional Highest Rookie Seed & Regional Finalists (Thanks 930 & 2039)
2008 MN Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 2472 & 1756)
2009 Northstar Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 171 & 525)

Last edited by Vikesrock : 16-03-2010 at 18:55. Reason: spelling
  #65   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 18:52
Thuperscout's Avatar
Thuperscout Thuperscout is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Wyrzykowski
FRC #0217 (Thunderchickens)
Team Role: Scout
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Shelby Twp.
Posts: 22
Thuperscout is just really niceThuperscout is just really niceThuperscout is just really niceThuperscout is just really nice
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikesrock View Post
The drive partially underneath the tunnel and contact the tower before unfolding any of their mechanism from the video I have seen.
You are correct, they go underneath the tunnel partially, and have a spring- board that pushes up against the tunnel to wedge them in place. Then their mechanism unfolds.
__________________
  #66   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 19:11
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,967
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Doenges View Post
A scenario I can see happening is 469 gets into position and starts to cycle balls into their goal. Their opponents, knowing they can't beat them, do nothing but watch. They get the winners score but why give 469's team any coopertition points.
Winners get 5 more points than losers.
Just my opinion. *flame suit on*
Interesting that you should mention this.

Instead of 'doing nothing' the opponent tries to flood 469s human players so that they cannot keep up with the soccer balls and may not be able to reintroduce them quickly enough (because they'll jam ... etc).

Just another thought at getting more seeding points than your opponent.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 21:00
Radical Pi Radical Pi is offline
Putting the Jumper in the Bumper
AKA: Ian Thompson
FRC #0639 (Code Red Robotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 655
Radical Pi has a spectacular aura aboutRadical Pi has a spectacular aura aboutRadical Pi has a spectacular aura about
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

I'm surprised nobody has come up with a (kinda obvious) solution: push them

As far as I know, tower protection doesn't start until finale. A robot with a high-traction drive system (such as treads) and is short enough to fit under the tower could play in the far zone and try to just push 469 away from the tower. I don't know too much about their drive system, but if you can get enough force on them then they could be pushed out of the tower, forcing them to lower the return system (if they can). The inital release would probably be considered forced by another robot, but if they don't pull it back down there could be a G30 penalty on them. Also, the pure fact that their return is no longer working would mean balls would roll back into midfield, where another cleanup bot could kick them to the near zone, taking balls out of the 469 loop

Highly dependent on how firmly they are in the tower and if you can find a robot that fits under the tower and could push them (639 might have a chance, but we will never see them at competition)
__________________

"To have no errors would be life without meaning. No strugle, no joy"
"A network is only as strong as it's weakest linksys"
  #68   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 21:02
John G John G is offline
Registered User
FRC #0399 (Eagle Robotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 72
John G is on a distinguished road
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Thank you for clarifying thuperscout.
  #69   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 21:03
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,707
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical Pi View Post
I'm surprised nobody has come up with a (kinda obvious) solution: push them

As far as I know, tower protection doesn't start until finale. A robot with a high-traction drive system (such as treads) and is short enough to fit under the tower could play in the far zone and try to just push 469 away from the tower. I don't know too much about their drive system, but if you can get enough force on them then they could be pushed out of the tower, forcing them to lower the return system (if they can). The inital release would probably be considered forced by another robot, but if they don't pull it back down there could be a G30 penalty on them. Also, the pure fact that their return is no longer working would mean balls would roll back into midfield, where another cleanup bot could kick them to the near zone, taking balls out of the 469 loop

Highly dependent on how firmly they are in the tower and if you can find a robot that fits under the tower and could push them (639 might have a chance, but we will never see them at competition)
It's been established that 469 dramatically increases their normal force by reacting against the top of the tunnel. Pushing them isn't very easy or possible.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #70   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 21:04
David Dawson's Avatar
David Dawson David Dawson is offline
Capt'n turned Mentor
FRC #3771 (Yooper Troopers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 62
David Dawson will become famous soon enoughDavid Dawson will become famous soon enough
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical Pi View Post
I'm surprised nobody has come up with a (kinda obvious) solution: push them


Highly dependent on how firmly they are in the tower and if you can find a robot that fits under the tower and could push them (639 might have a chance, but we will never see them at competition)
This "will" break the field
  #71   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 21:19
Radical Pi Radical Pi is offline
Putting the Jumper in the Bumper
AKA: Ian Thompson
FRC #0639 (Code Red Robotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 655
Radical Pi has a spectacular aura aboutRadical Pi has a spectacular aura aboutRadical Pi has a spectacular aura about
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Dawson View Post
This "will" break the field
That much force from the springboard? forget that plan
__________________

"To have no errors would be life without meaning. No strugle, no joy"
"A network is only as strong as it's weakest linksys"
  #72   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 21:43
synth3tk's Avatar
synth3tk synth3tk is offline
Volunteer / The Blue Alliance
AKA: David Thomas
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,005
synth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical Pi View Post
That much force from the springboard? forget that plan
Watch the one video that's posted. The blue near-side robot tried to bump 469, and yet 469 did not budge one bit.

It's a purt-near flawless system on paper, and as of now, in practice.
  #73   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 22:20
JGurnow's Avatar
JGurnow JGurnow is offline
Registered User
FRC #0217 (The Thunder Chickens)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Sterling Heights
Posts: 20
JGurnow is on a distinguished road
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical Pi View Post
That much force from the springboard? forget that plan
There is more then just a spring board, they also latch onto the interior tubes of the tower, the only way to move them is to move the tower with them. You could see the tower shift when 469 deployed its latches. You won't move them when they are in place.
  #74   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 22:56
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,685
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Dawson View Post
This "will" break the field
Interesting point. As field damage caused by a robot grasping field elements is always deemed the fault of said grasping robot. Even if caused by another robot colliding with said grasping robot.

Anyways, I'm man enough to say that I'm just plain jealous that they took this idea and made it work so well. We were briefly thinking about something like this, but missed some of the key refinements that make this work so well for them. Most particularly rolling the balls off the bumps to hurrying them along to the goals.

So, I'm having a difficult time coming up with a plan of attack against these guys. My only thoughts are a combination of denying them the tunnel for as long as possible and blocking and clearing balls as quickly as possible. This focuses 2 of your bots on defending this single bot, which isn't an obvious strategy for success in itself.

Relevant question I've posted to the Q&A however:
How does G37 impact 469's robot? G37 allows for outside the bumper contact with robots expanded outside their normal configuration and in the process of being elevated or suspended. 469 is clearly the former and clearly not the latter. Will a team be penalized and/or red carded for intentionally touching one of those chutes? This has bearing on many other robots that expand outside the normal perimeter but do not or cannot immediately begin elevating or suspending. We'll see what the GDC has to say. If anything.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
  #75   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2010, 22:59
JGurnow's Avatar
JGurnow JGurnow is offline
Registered User
FRC #0217 (The Thunder Chickens)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Sterling Heights
Posts: 20
JGurnow is on a distinguished road
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

A team cannot be made to have a penalty by the actions of another team. That is why being pushed into an opposing alliance robot by their teammate will not result in a penalty for either team.

You can't cause others to get penalties, if you do neither team gets said penalty, it just goes away.

Last edited by JGurnow : 16-03-2010 at 23:01.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Checking <R19> Creator Mat Rules/Strategy 7 13-02-2010 16:13
R19 MarcusF Rules/Strategy 12 09-01-2010 21:49
Your opinion: does our mesh violate rule R07?? RoboMaster Rules/Strategy 9 16-02-2009 18:46
Project does not build team 803 Programming 5 27-02-2006 17:03
Program does not end NNSWIZ Programming 4 21-03-2005 22:33


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi