|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#76
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
From what I've heard, they're wedged in. You're more likely to make holes in the carpet than get them out.
|
|
#77
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
Quote:
Part of their domination was due to the fact that no other alliance could do this at WPI. The 5th alliance (2791 195 1124) could grab 1 ball in auto and kick 2 into the midfield if everything lined up right, making the game a lot more contested, but they got knocked out by an alliance that was worse equipped to handle 230. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
Quote:
To answer the question about our bot breaking down, the power cable to our camera came loose when we got bumped. We're fixing it though, making it hard-wired since we realized it was pretty loose. Good thing we caught it before it happened in Atlanta. |
|
#79
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
Quote:
|
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
how does this fit in the rules... can someone direct me in the rule book where it says that a team can latch onto a field element
|
|
#81
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
There's no rule prohibiting it.
|
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
really... i would think that with all the strict ruling this year, something like that would be prohibited
|
|
#83
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best of the Best
Of course this suggestion is mostly a product of an over-active sense of patriotism, but 188 didn't look too shabby at Finger Lakes... even when stacked against 217.
|
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
yes... but that is in the finale... not regular teleoperated
|
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
|
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
Actually, a robot can hang at any time during the match. (If it is touching its tower, it can actually expand to finale configuration any time during the match.)
|
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
yeah... ijust read that section of the rules... thanks for all the answers guys
|
|
#89
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
Quote:
I agree we can be pushed, but that was a sacrifice we decided on for mobility. But if we can still win 75% of the matches in the country before our partners score, than thats pretty good and our partners just add to that. Ofcourse there are those high scoring matches to look out for! I think the only way to beat a 469 is to not let the alliance score in the first place. If the balls dont go in the goal, they cant return them. So you need to clear the zone and keep their partners from scroing. If you are from 469... my hats off to you for thinking out of the box. Awesome job. I think there are several good sweepers out there, most of them just plow the balls in. We just feed them and if they are tied up with a defender we score our selves on the other goal from any of the zones. 20 did a great job because that have a great ball handler. Others have mentioned this too, I dont know why they allow teams to push more than one ball in at a time, I saw several doing it (217 , 2370, 3280 to name a few - my appologies if I remember the team numbers wrong) I thought that was a penalty! Not saying I like the rule, but I was pretty sure we werent allowed to score that way. OR was this changed in a Team Update? Any how, good luck to you all in remaining regionals. Last edited by stevek : 03-19-2010 at 12:12 AM. |
|
#90
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best Robot of 2010
Quote:
http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=15072 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Render Quality, Is "Best" really best? | Andrew Schreiber | SolidWorks | 4 | 06-11-2009 01:36 PM |
| Best Matches (best fought not score) | ne0x0n | General Forum | 13 | 04-01-2005 12:40 PM |
| The best 2 minutes of TV | DCA Fan | Chit-Chat | 1 | 05-01-2003 08:26 PM |
| The Best of the Best | archiver | 1999 | 9 | 06-23-2002 10:10 PM |