|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Was this useful? | |||
| Yes, it was! It helped point out diamonds in the rough |
|
109 | 70.32% |
| No, its numbers generally did not correspond to robot's actual on-field performance |
|
46 | 29.68% |
| Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Easy to use Offensive Power Rankings (OPR) program for mid-regional scouting
At the Oregon, New Jersey, and Pittsburgh regionals, the alliances with the best OPR were the winners. Over the years, it has been consistant that the OPR team score was a 90%ile indicator of sucess. Bongle makes a great point about the defense as the 1251+1612+86 alliance was the number 2 rated defense in the eliminations. I am curious about how many of the regional winning teams were predicted by OPR for weeks 1 & 2 in 2010. At a glance, Florida seems the exception.
![]() Last edited by Jacob Plicque : 17-03-2010 at 23:35. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Offensive Power Ranking Calculations | Greg Marra | General Forum | 4 | 18-03-2009 22:03 |
| Offensive Power Rankings for 2008 | Bongle | General Forum | 166 | 18-05-2008 15:05 |
| Offensive+Defensive Power Rankings | BornaE | General Forum | 4 | 05-04-2008 01:33 |
| 2006 Offensive Power Ratings | sw293 | General Forum | 16 | 10-05-2006 17:04 |
| (CURIE) Let's make this Easy for all of us. [scouting] | 157#1Driver | Championship Event | 13 | 22-04-2002 08:56 |