|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tank drive mecanum algorithm
I'm not trying to judge or anything, but why have a tank drive mecanum?
I guess if you are using joysticks that don't have twist this would be nice, but don't the kit joysticks have twist? Joystick 2's only purpose is to provide twist input (unless you count the average for forward). Joy1 gets used for strafe input. I think the sensitivity vars are nice, but can be used for single joystick input just as well. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: tank drive mecanum algorithm
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
With a 3-axis joystick this isn't necessary since the normal mapping of 3-axis joystick functions to robot motions is already separated. ~ |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: tank drive mecanum algorithm
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: tank drive mecanum algorithm
Quote:
For a tank-drive non-mecanum robot with only 2 drive motors (one for the left wheels and 1 for the right wheels), this certainly makes sense. But for a robot with 4 mecanum wheels (and 1 motor per wheel), "pure motor=joystick" would require 4 joystick inputs. I seriously doubt if any driver has developed the mental agility to individually and directly control each wheel command for a mecanum-wheeled robot. That is why I presented the mapping of the 2 standard tank-drive joystick commands, plus 1 additional joystick command for strafe, to the 4 mecanum wheels via 3 intermediate variables which separate out the 3 robot degrees of freedom (fwd/rev, strafe, turn), so they can be tuned independently. ~ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tank Drive vs. Omni Directional Drive | jamie_1930 | General Forum | 9 | 24-01-2010 22:50 |
| crab drive vs. mecanum drive system | superbotman | Technical Discussion | 33 | 06-01-2010 03:09 |
| Tank Drive | Sauce | Programming | 1 | 05-01-2009 18:50 |
| pic: Jester Drive:Mecanum Wheel Drive Train | Ken Delaney 357 | Technical Discussion | 64 | 29-03-2006 22:16 |