Go to Post Don't like the predictions? Go out there and prove me wrong! - Looking Forward [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Other > Chit-Chat
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-09-2002, 15:02
Madison's Avatar
Madison Madison is offline
Dancing through life...
FRC #0488 (Xbot)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,243
Madison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by FotoPlasma
(1/4in)/2 = 1/8in
pi(1/8in)^2 = 0.049087385212341in^2
0.049087385212341in^2 * .125in = 0.0061359231515426in^3
1/0.0061359231515426in^3 = 162.9746617261 quarter inch holes per in^3
(I love my TI-89)
solve(((162.9746617261holes)/(0.098lb/in^3))=((x)/(1)),x)
According to my calculations, 1663.0067523071 holes per lb of aluminum...

If any of that looks wrong, please alert me to it immediately...

I hope that's right... it's kinda late...
Two things, I think.

First, wouldn't it have been easier to find the weight of one 1/4" dia. x 1/8" thick piece of aluminum, and divide 1 lb. by that number? It seems like there's less math involved, and it omits having to make assumptions about the number of holes per in^3.

Therein, I think, lies the second problem. First, the number of holes should be measure in square inches, rather than cubic inches, because we're assuming that each hole goes entirely through the thickness of the aluminum. Second, while the combined area of 162... holes may approximate 1 in^2, the reality is that it may be a better approximation to treat each hole as a slightly larger square, thus insuring that you can properly punch the specified number of holes, and also providing you with a chance at having a piece of aluminum left when you're done.

If that doesn't make sense, I can try to clarify further

EDIT: Oh oh oh. I see what you did. It was just backward from what I did, kinda, but it's the same in the end.

Duh. Still, for what it's worth, assuming a 1/16" sliver of clearance on each side of the holes, you can fit 7 hole per square inch. 1600+ holes are required to lose one pound. That'd mean you'd have to continuously and uninterruptedly hole up 19.41 square feet of aluminum to lose 1 pound
__________________
--Madison--

...down at the Ozdust!

Like a grand and miraculous spaceship, our planet has sailed through the universe of time. And for a brief moment, we have been among its many passengers.

Last edited by Madison : 17-09-2002 at 15:32.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Valued CD members GregTheGreat Thanks and/or Congrats 16 07-07-2003 12:58
Junior member wishes to be senior member.. randomperson Chit-Chat 5 07-04-2003 18:50
Junior Member/ Senior Member / Frequent Contributor / <<WHATEVER YOU WANT HERE>> yangotang CD Forum Support 5 13-02-2003 12:41
Is anyone a member at SharingFIRST! archiver 2000 3 23-06-2002 22:14
Gael Force Member Contact archiver 1999 2 23-06-2002 22:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi