|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Crazy Robot Inspection Stories
You seriously need to add functionality... As long as you can do it in allowed build periods, of course!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Crazy Robot Inspection Stories
Not always. If the robot meets their goals why should they add functionality? I would prefer not to do something than to sacrifice doing something I already do. Now, perhaps improve functionality... You guys have a lot of weight to play with, why not make sure your kicker works better or your ball manipulator works great?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Crazy Robot Inspection Stories
Speed racer weighed 65lbs in the end and worked perfectly. Our team decided not to focus on hanging if it meant we would have mediocre ball kicking and handling. So we avoided it and still ended with a rather good robot.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Crazy Robot Inspection Stories
Lower weight can be a large part of your functionality if your function is to be very agile. It's all part of strategy. If you can outrun the big guys and do what you want then good for you.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robot Self-Inspection Process | Diana Gee | Regional Competitions | 3 | 14-01-2010 13:21 |
| Official Robot Inspection Sheet | b-rant | General Forum | 1 | 20-01-2007 17:02 |
| Robot Inspection Checklist | ChuckDickerson | Technical Discussion | 2 | 16-02-2006 21:30 |
| Crazy Inspection Stories | Mike Ciance | Championship Event | 21 | 15-04-2003 00:04 |
| Robot Inspection | Yan Wang | Regional Competitions | 1 | 20-02-2003 21:00 |