|
|
|
 Count on the English teacher to be the one to actually understand the wording of the rules! - dlavery [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Count on the English teacher to be the one to actually understand the wording of the rules! - dlavery [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#3
03-25-2010, 12:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Unexpected results from Encoder::GetRate()
Have you guys tried 2x and 4x modes? Do you get what you expect in those modes?
At a glance, it looks like the period should be divided by DecodingScaleFactor(), as suggested. I don't think the 4x version should have the "4.0" in the denominator either. I need to try it out when I'm at a system that has an encoder. I'm at the regional in Cleveland this weekend. -Joe 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [BB] An unexpected change in plans | yodameister | General Forum | 22 | 12-01-2009 09:26 PM |
| Inconsistent reading from encoder get rate | rwood359 | National Instruments LabVIEW and Data Acquisition | 5 | 01-13-2009 07:10 PM |
| Results from Drexel, thanks from 365. | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 06-24-2002 02:44 AM |
| Results from GLR? | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 06-24-2002 02:44 AM |
| results from regionals | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 06-23-2002 10:31 PM |
Threaded Mode