|
|
|
 I think Dave was tired...he kept muttering something about "eviscerating" someone. Heidi seemed to be doing most of the talking. Actually, after talking with 29,000 people, I think she lost her voice. Or maybe Dave "eviscerated" it.... - RoboMom [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#9
28-03-2010, 13:00
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Who did NOT have comm problems in Waterloo regional?
A few teams (771, 843 & 1503) re-WPA'd their adapters during the elimination rounds. Though I don't believe the root causes were identified, that was done as a precautionary measure.
772 had communication issues which appeared to be with the robot itself. There were no major delays due to FMS problems. (And regarding the schedule being ahead: actually, it was just set up with generous breaks—the Friday schedule ended pretty early, as did the qualification rounds on Saturday. This was presumably to avoid getting into trouble if the field did act up.) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BDC-Comm Problems when setting jaguars up for CAN | LeelandS | Programming | 12 | 02-02-2010 16:00 |
| Camera power/comm problems disable the DSC | rwood359 | FRC Control System | 2 | 03-02-2009 12:34 |
| Teams who went to waterloo Regional | bilal1219 | Regional Competitions | 0 | 24-03-2007 23:29 |
| why did technokats have lots of problems? | jon virgi | Championship Event | 23 | 14-04-2003 15:44 |
| $3500 limit - Who does not have questions | Raul | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 12-01-2003 11:31 |
Threaded Mode