|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
I was pretty disappointed with play quality today, hopefully everything is working better tomorrow
|
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Quote:
604 is by far the best bot here, playing a lot like 971 did at SVR and doing a great job at it. Expect them in the finals, possibly bringing home the gold! |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Quote:
Consistently scores two balls from mid-field in auto and hangs. I predict whomever seeds first picks 1280. 3256 is an impressive team all-round. Very beautifully built robot, and one of the most imposing pits I have ever seen. ![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
A pretty good prediction, but I've got a feeling that 1280 will end up as the first seed, in which case they would most likely pick 604. First seed will probably be decided by match 72 (1280 vs. 604). Not taking anything away from what 3256 has accomplished, I just think 1280 and 604 can pick up more seeding points than 3256 in the matchups for Thursday morning.
But anyways, can't wait to watch more Breakaway action via webcast! Last edited by 115inventorsam : 01-04-2010 at 12:22. Reason: wrong match# |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
WOW NEW WORLD RECORD FOR PENALTIES
The blue alliance teams 3256, 814, 2541 combined for a total of 89 penalty points in qual match #70 DOGMA penalties can really suck this year. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Any details on what happened for the 89 penalty points? Did they miss a ball in the return? Field error? WTH?
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Quote:
And looks like 1280 may have locked up the #1 seed as I predicted, unless if 3256 can make up the deficit. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
looks like top 3 are pretty much locked in, 3256 might've been able to get to second in that last match
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Quote:
I'm curious as to how the alliances are going to turn out. Apparently the rankings are 5 matches behind so the top 3 might switch up. I'm thinking #1 will be 604/1280. |
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Quote:
Ranking system fail? Redraft? Did they reverse the penalties in Q72? Last edited by The Lucas : 01-04-2010 at 15:46. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
So why is Sacramento being played in the middle of the week?
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Monetary purposes I think, I'm pretty sure there also wasn't going to be a practice day but I think Jim Beck fought for it
I'm extremely confused about the rankings.... |
|
#28
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
It was something Q72. It was 5-0 win for 1280, and became a 6-3 win for 604. If they just removed the penalties that 604's alliance got, it would have been 6-5, so something else happened too.
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Initial rankings:
1.604 2.3256 3.2122 4.1280 5.2035 6.1323 7.2141 8.852 1. 604 3256 2761 2. 2122 2035 1835 3. 1280 1323 675 4. 2141 1351 2156 5. 852 1516 766 6. 2473 2073 1662 7. 1678 751 1458 8. 841 2551 2085 |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2010 Sacramento Regional
Interesting that 604 picked 3256 over 1280. Ah well, I'm sure they'll meet in the finals.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FF]: 2010 Sacramento Tier 2 | Vikesrock | Fantasy FIRST | 35 | 29-03-2010 20:51 |
| [FF]: 2010 Sacramento Tier 1 | Vikesrock | Fantasy FIRST | 16 | 27-03-2010 23:14 |
| Sacramento Regional | jmarsh24 | General Forum | 1 | 03-04-2009 09:29 |
| Davis/Sacramento Regional | cfriedenbach | Regional Competitions | 5 | 03-08-2006 19:12 |
| Sacramento Regional | Cory | Regional Competitions | 71 | 30-03-2004 20:48 |