|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
Kind of like Atlanta but just one giant regional! |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
My main point was that you can't sacrifice a prolific scorer as 217 to defend 469. In the elimination rounds, it will be doubtful that an alliance will have 3 prolific scorers. So during the selections the role of a strong defensive bot increases. Running and gunning with teams will cause some pretty exciting matches. But ultimately, defense wins championships. A great team will consist of robots that will play doing what they do best, and IMHO that's two prolific scorers and a robust defense bot. |
|
#33
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
|
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
Also, 971, unfortunately, must have had a bad set of qualifications matches since they were 2-5 during qualifications, so they would not have been noticed by most scouting teams (props to the scouting teams of 111 and 67 for finding a diamond in the rough). *The only time where I saw a division that rivals the depth of MSC was Galileo '08, where there were easily 10-15 powerhouse teams. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
But maybe this year I am completely wrong. Michigan teams are that much better this year, with 33, 27, 2337, and many others rising up from off years to create powerful machines. Last edited by JABot67 : 04-04-2010 at 22:47. Reason: Oops, 65 was picked on Galileo Field. |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
. But quite honestly the more I look and think about it, even the michigan districts were stacked. For example, even though 33 is good this year we haven't won a compitition because of the crazy level of compitition we have faced all season. At Kettering we faced 67 and 910, in Troy we faced 217 and 469, and in States we faced 67 and 217. I think this just goes to further show just how competitive/crazy Michigan really is. |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Correlation is not causeality. Please investigate years prior to the district system and look at how many Michigan teams performed above average in the championships before suggesting that the /newly/ formed district structure is a cause of Michigan being so competitive.
|
|
#38
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
With only one year to judge upon, I think it's impossible to be able to ascertain if the district system is making a difference, nor to expect it to make a large difference in its first year. It'll take a little time before most teams in Michigan are unaffected by how things are done out-of-state.
|
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
469 is an amazing machine. I believe that they lawyered their way around an incredible amount of rules, and that their bot isn't in "the spirit of the game". After seeing their robot in action, there were many red flags that went off in my team's heads. We looked up the rules that we thought they were breaking, but couldn't find anything they broke. They definitely read the rules very literally.
At MSC, there were a couple of alliances that were able to shut them down. The key was starving them. Also, if the Thunderchickens had a side-kicker then they would have been able to defeat 469 with ease. They could have just moved back-and-forth, and then hit the ball across the field as soon as they blocked it. 469 is the most hated team in the FRC, but I'd be willing to bet that 469 gets to Einstein. However, I know that I'll be rooting for the other team no matter what. |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
I'm not sure 469 is the most hated team in FRC...I know I gained even more respect and appreciation of them this year. |
|
#41
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
469 is a model FIRST team who has reached a level that we should all be striving for. I do find myself kicking myself for not pushing for a design like theirs. Once I get past that initial embarrassment, I am simply in awe of what they have done this year. I will be rooting for them heavily at championship, except if/when I have to face them. The level of greatness that they have achieved is nothing short of inspiring, and I am in awe of that. It is what Team 1114 strives for every year. Last edited by Karthik : 05-04-2010 at 13:18. |
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
In my opinion this is how first should be run in 15 years or so:
Each team is placed in a state division based on sponsoring, experience, past wins, and such. The divisions would be like varsity sports today with A-AAAAA. The state would sponsor the state competition between each team in different divisions. Also the state would by the KOP for each team that wanted to have FIRST as a varsity sport, each additional part would have to be independently funded. The winners and runners up would all qualify for regionals. The regionals would be run directly by first and would have divisions A-AAAAA. The winners and runners up of each division would qualify for nationals. The national winners for only 5A would go to a world championship against the national winners for like Japan and stuff. IT WOULD BE INSANE. |
|
#43
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
As soon as you put teams in divisions based on performance and many other aspects, you lose the sole purpose of FIRST, insperation. Every team will then play the no holds bar, win at all cost, game. The lesser teams will not have an example to aspire to because they will have no direct contact with the AAAAA teams. Using the division system like this would be a terrible idea. This is in no way what ths thread is about though, so I digress.
On the topic at hand, if I were hot I think I would have declined. What would be better for them: another state trophy or knowing that they can topple, arguably, the most likly canidate for a championship win? Easy choice. |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
{-- smiley just for you Ed} |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 1 | EricH | Fantasy FIRST | 29 | 03-04-2010 17:58 |
| [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 1 | EricH | Fantasy FIRST | 56 | 04-04-2009 18:04 |
| pic: Coaching at The Garden State Rumble FVC Championship | Jay Trzaskos | Extra Discussion | 5 | 11-12-2006 17:39 |
| get $10,000 for you cause.... | jlee25 | Chit-Chat | 0 | 22-07-2004 14:59 |
| A Small Favor for a Big Cause | ComBBAT_Amy | General Forum | 6 | 30-03-2003 12:26 |