|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
which Red won 14-12 . Basically, when there is a tie (like the original match 19), FMS will write over the tie with the deciding match score. For whatever reason FMS doesnt allow there to be ties or more than 3 matches per series in the elims. TBA has to fix this issue manually, which it looks like they did. Your badge should update soon.Last edited by The Lucas : 05-04-2010 at 01:11. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Final Results for NC:
1.) 1086 1902 48 W 2.) 1519 1772 1741 F 3.) 2228 2614 401 QF 4.) 122 337 21 QF 5.) 2483 1319 3336 SF 6.) 379 79 832 SF 7.) 449 2655 2415 QF 8.) 435 3402 900 QF |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
On frcfms twitter feed of FRC-spy. TBA fixed the champions, not the scores. In contrast, Northstar had 2 ties and is not fixed yet.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
I assume the database will be released shortly after the divisions are announced?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
You are correct. The database group is working furiously to have this year's version ready for the release of the divisions.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Im not sure if it still matters, but Id still just like to post this anyway. Some fields may not be accurate since I dont know exactly what each team seeded (etc), but the results are right, I think. If there is a problem, that needs to be changed, feel free to tell me.
Curie: 1) 1114, 469, 2041 W 2) 111, 1538, 2630 SF 3) 1986, 1676, 888* F 4) 2612, 27, 141 SF 5) 1306, 2337, 624 QF 6) 175, 88, 573 QF 7) 3235, 2775, 40 QF 8) 1511, 1732, 368 QF *888 switched in with 1421 Newton: 1) 67, 177, 294 W 2) 20, 668, 2757 SF 3) 16, 343, 1718 F 4) 102, 1922, 1073 SF 5) 706, 910, 1592 QF 6) 1902, 337, 1868 QF 7) 971, 525, 2137 QF 8) 308, 399 2619 QF Galileo: 1) 1086, 217, 2429 F 2) 1717, 271, 263 QF 3) 51, 78, 2122 SF 4) 1625, 2056, 3138 W 5) 2016, 188, 1058 QF 6) 365, 79, 744 QF 7) 230, 1714, 1305 SF 8) 1771, 2130, 85 QF Archimedes: (thanks alex) 1) 254, 233, 3357 W 2) 33, 148, 201 F 3) 1124, 968, 2062 SF 4) 330, 25, 1622 SF 5) 1519, 1918, 70 QF 6) 604, 341, 3256 QF 7) 3280, 359, 71 QF 8) 1730, 234, 1218 QF Einstein: C) 1114, 469, 2041 F N) 67, 177, 294 W G) 1625, 2056, 3138 SF A) 254, 233, 3357 SF A vs C G vs N Last edited by delsaner : 18-04-2010 at 17:33. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
2) 330, 25, 1622 SF 4th Seed 3) 33, 148, 201 F 2nd Seed 4) 1124, 968, 2062 SF 3rd Seed 5) 604, 341, 3256 QF 6th Seed 6) 3280, 359, 71 QF 7th Seed 7) 1519, 1918, 70 QF 5th Seed 8) 1730, 234, 1218 QF 8th Seed EDIT: Switched around teams in order to show correct alliance picking. Italicized to show changes. Last edited by Alex Dinsmoor : 18-04-2010 at 16:35. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
2) 111, 1538, 2630 SF 3) 1986, 1676, 888* F 4) 2612, 27, 141 SF 5) 1306, 2337, 624 QF 6) 175, 88, 573 QF 7) 3235, 40, 2775 QF 8) 1511, 1732, 368 QF I personally don't remember the order for Alliance 6, 7, and 8 -Clinton- |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
7 is: 3234, 2775, 40 8 is correct |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Denying an Alliance Selection | Magnechu | General Forum | 56 | 03-04-2008 13:04 |
| New alliance selection method | Bharat Nain | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 08-01-2006 22:16 |
| [OCCRA]: CMP Alliance Selection | Alex Golec | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 14-11-2005 18:20 |
| Alliance Selection 2005- Like it? | OneAngryDaisy | Rules/Strategy | 42 | 14-03-2005 14:59 |
| Alliance Selection Clarification | Bill Beatty | Off-Season Events | 1 | 11-11-2001 07:11 |