|
Re: The Divisions...
I love the idea of having divisions that are sticky. FIRST has already kindof done this with Michigan. Back in the day, I'm making it seem like I'm old here, when I was on my team, we knews tons of teams from around the country due to we traveled to the different regionals. But now with the Michigan Districts, we dont see or get to know any of these teams any more. Why should it be any different then at other compititions. Who is the best at this division is going to play who is the best at this other division. I think that if FIRST is going to have a district format at one place, why not have it for the rest. Do I think that it is the right way, maybe maybe not. But if we want to be FAIR like so many of us have said, than I think we should go this route.
__________________
my FIRST acomplishments: 2003:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, Archimedes Division winner, National Champion (w/ 111 and 469) 2004:MWR Finalist 2005:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, MWR Innovation in Controls award 2006:hmmm wow, umm we got picked 4th overall at Nats by 121
my FIRST resume: 65 (2003-2006)
|
Anything worth analyzing is worth over-analyzing. And anything worth over-analyzing is worth hyper-analyzing. Ready, go! - Michael Hill [more] 
Similar Threads
Hybrid Mode
