Division Strengths 2010

[Ed Law]

Originally Posted by IKE

I think it shows a more accurate representation of MSC strength. Stretching it moves MSC's Number 3 OPR guy to compare relative to a divsions number 4. this artifically inflates the MSC from a visual perspective. Some other interesting points would be the bump in the MSC curve from 10-30. I would suspect that these 20 would show an improving trend if you graphed their OPRs versus events.

I would be really interested in comparing 2010 MSC data to a theoretical 2008 MSC. Both are robot centric games with higher OPR correlation to match outcomes.

The reason why I stretch the MSC data is to make it a fair comparison. Otherwise you will be comparing the 65 teams at MSC to the top 65 out of the 87 teams in each division. I am trying to compare the overall relative strength of each division and MSC and not trying to compare the top robots to the top robots.